but all i can say about the topic has been said at this point.

Just get a tatoo of a qr code on your private parts

No one would dare try to validate your id

@Wizard_of_The_West fuck man, why not just make everyone get a bar code on their arm?

Because you can literally take a picture of it and copy it

what about a chip underneath the skin

You can literally scan it in passing and copy it

Or knock'em with a punny joke

no it will have dual factor authentication just like the new chip cards

you will have to have the pin to activate it

that is how the new credit cards have been able to destory the card scanners

For now

the problem is that these things can still be broken on a much larger scale if it is done online.

the dual factor authentication make it extremely hard and costly for criminals

@ARockRaider how so? i dont see a way with dual factor authentication

he says it really well in that vid, if its online changeing one vote cost about as much as changeing a million votes.

Didn't you watch Silicone Valley? Just wait for AI to crack it.

`Multi-factor authentication is an authentication method in which a computer user is granted access only after successfully presenting two or more pieces of evidence to an authentication mechanism: knowledge, possession, and inherence. Two-factor authentication is a type, or subset, of multi-factor authentication`

and again we aren't really talking about the voters ID that is the problem, we are talking about the final counter.

@ARockRaider the individual will be able to check their vote was checked in the system after voting to make sure that they did it right

and if the system lies to you?

how would you know?

You also have the problem with companies that facilitate the networks being hacked and then copying the values.

@ARockRaider the real question is if this is a harder system to lie about than the current one

which the multi factor would be

currently you just show up and go and have no way to check

no way to check afterwards if it was counted

because in the current one we *should* have people hand counting the votes in front of reps form every side, if there is a miss count there is someone who is more likely to be upset about that miss count right there.

Just use bitcoin to vote duh

in the last mid term eleciton there was litteraly a black women who was caught and tried for destorying republican ballots in florida

So much for no voter fraud

the entire place was complicit in the fraud

you think there are not more of that happening?

so you send in your own reps to watch the vote count at all the poll stations in that area, if someone has a problem with more eyes on the box they need to be investagted.

there are also people who go around door to door picking up peoples ballots, you think they are not destorying the ones they do not like in california? just kidding, they already have gotten caught multiple times

again that is not what i'm talking about, that needs to be delt with as well.

the voteing must be done on a site where reps form any of the people on the ballot can be there and watch to be sure that nothing is funny.

and the box should be transported in their sight at all times.

you are advocateing for a system where it is even harder to keep track of the votes and it is vulnerable to interference form almost anywhere.

do you think for any amount of time that the US election wouldn't inspire every hacker on the planet to try their hand at changeing something?

not true at all, the multifactor security would be more secure than the current system for sure. Do you not understand how multifactor authentication works?