I think you are mixing up alot of ideologies right now. (brue)

People should have to perform some kind of difficult public service (doesnt have to be military) before they are allowed to vote or hold office to prove that they can put the needs of society over their own wants and agendas

anarchocapitalism allows for monarchy, go read hoppe if you are interested

Thats what I said @TheGhostAgent

monarachy is nothing more than consolidated private property, all the people are my property, all of it is enforced through violence and threat

its is the truest form of anarcho capitalism, because it is the indivudal that then acts in his own interest against other states in an anarchical foreign policy game

capitalism was a term made up my marx if i remember right.
to us now it just means "free market"
and all "free market" means is "the the government doesn't mess with the market"
so you are free to buy, sell and trade and it's only between you and the person you are dealing with right now.

@Tiberius And what will this test/standard be? Who will be setting said standards? That is asking for abuse of power when a group of ppl can set standards of who can or cannot vote.

capitalism is a term which describes the private ownership of capital and property

free market isn't even a form of government, it's a state of government (like a state of matter)

that's why i said that it was a word made up by marx.

the free market was argued by adam smith in his wealth of nations

`Capitalism is an economic system based on the private ownership of the means of production and their operation for profit`

because "private property" is a better descriptor for itself then "capitalism" is

monarchy is capitalism

they own all the stuff in thier property

it is a form of anarchocapitalism

it is natural

you are mixing up a bunch of things such that you words are now meaningless.

the state is a public entity, the monarch is a private entity

There is no test or standard, you complete your two year term (or longer if the service requires) could be military service, firefighting, EMS, Law Enforcement, Truck driving, Sewage maintenance, infrastructure, Lineman work, etc. Anything that requires personal sacrifice for the betterment of society.

the government under a monarch is a private entity

not a public one like america

"private property" and "free market" are parts of each other, if I own a thing then i can sell it to whomever I please at whatever price I please. (assuming the buyer agrees on the price)
This includes my own time and labor.

The government would be small, efficient, and have very little to do with the life private civillian

and as i said before, "private property and free market" are a state if government, not a type of government.
though there are governments that are incapable of allowing the system to exist.

Seriously take a walk in Los Amgeles or San Francisco and come back and argue universal suffrage with me.

Which raises the Q of who will be setting the time allotment for each profession? And under what standards will we be using? If we're aiming to have smaller govt, I think it is far more efficient to have a smaller govt via limiting its powers vs limiting the kind of voters or having a voting test

Having freedoms also implies having the freedom to fucking up

Freedom does not guarantee the best results

"Having freedoms also implies having the freedom to fucking up"
this, all of this.

Not just limiting the kind of voters

anarcho capitalism allows for monarchisim because it is a form of private ownership

all ancaps understand this

read some hoppe

Brue you are makeing things up now.

Limiting the kind of people who can hold office

<:ancap_ball:636787271466483712>

If all we're allowed to do and choose in our lives are optimum choices, from being healthy and never drinking, smoking, and only eating broccoli n kale. Is that freedom and a life worth living?

I can see where you logic chain is going, but it is not attached to anything. (brue)

I never argued for that