Message from @TheGhostAgent
Discord ID: 653739908665573376
so it's just anarchy.
with a fancy name.
its monarchy
what?
ancap implies 0 form of govt. Feudalism itself IS a form of govt under monarchial rule... again, I don't think you understand wtf ancap is
monarchy was anarchocapitalist
just one person was able to consolidate through force their property
no a monarchy means you have a king, or head ruler at least.
and that their word is law.
yes, anything on my property is mine to do with it as i please
I never said there should be no voting
i set my rules on my property
Dont strawman me ready my actual statement
I think you are mixing up alot of ideologies right now. (brue)
People should have to perform some kind of difficult public service (doesnt have to be military) before they are allowed to vote or hold office to prove that they can put the needs of society over their own wants and agendas
anarchocapitalism allows for monarchy, go read hoppe if you are interested
Thats what I said @TheGhostAgent
monarachy is nothing more than consolidated private property, all the people are my property, all of it is enforced through violence and threat
its is the truest form of anarcho capitalism, because it is the indivudal that then acts in his own interest against other states in an anarchical foreign policy game
capitalism was a term made up my marx if i remember right.
to us now it just means "free market"
and all "free market" means is "the the government doesn't mess with the market"
so you are free to buy, sell and trade and it's only between you and the person you are dealing with right now.
@Tiberius And what will this test/standard be? Who will be setting said standards? That is asking for abuse of power when a group of ppl can set standards of who can or cannot vote.
capitalism is a term which describes the private ownership of capital and property
free market isn't even a form of government, it's a state of government (like a state of matter)
that's why i said that it was a word made up by marx.
the free market was argued by adam smith in his wealth of nations
`Capitalism is an economic system based on the private ownership of the means of production and their operation for profit`
because "private property" is a better descriptor for itself then "capitalism" is
monarchy is capitalism
they own all the stuff in thier property
it is a form of anarchocapitalism
it is natural
you are mixing up a bunch of things such that you words are now meaningless.
the state is a public entity, the monarch is a private entity
There is no test or standard, you complete your two year term (or longer if the service requires) could be military service, firefighting, EMS, Law Enforcement, Truck driving, Sewage maintenance, infrastructure, Lineman work, etc. Anything that requires personal sacrifice for the betterment of society.
the government under a monarch is a private entity
not a public one like america
"private property" and "free market" are parts of each other, if I own a thing then i can sell it to whomever I please at whatever price I please. (assuming the buyer agrees on the price)
This includes my own time and labor.
The government would be small, efficient, and have very little to do with the life private civillian
and as i said before, "private property and free market" are a state if government, not a type of government.
though there are governments that are incapable of allowing the system to exist.
Seriously take a walk in Los Amgeles or San Francisco and come back and argue universal suffrage with me.
Which raises the Q of who will be setting the time allotment for each profession? And under what standards will we be using? If we're aiming to have smaller govt, I think it is far more efficient to have a smaller govt via limiting its powers vs limiting the kind of voters or having a voting test