capitalism is a term which describes the private ownership of capital and property

free market isn't even a form of government, it's a state of government (like a state of matter)

that's why i said that it was a word made up by marx.

the free market was argued by adam smith in his wealth of nations

`Capitalism is an economic system based on the private ownership of the means of production and their operation for profit`

because "private property" is a better descriptor for itself then "capitalism" is

monarchy is capitalism

they own all the stuff in thier property

it is a form of anarchocapitalism

it is natural

you are mixing up a bunch of things such that you words are now meaningless.

the state is a public entity, the monarch is a private entity

There is no test or standard, you complete your two year term (or longer if the service requires) could be military service, firefighting, EMS, Law Enforcement, Truck driving, Sewage maintenance, infrastructure, Lineman work, etc. Anything that requires personal sacrifice for the betterment of society.

the government under a monarch is a private entity

not a public one like america

"private property" and "free market" are parts of each other, if I own a thing then i can sell it to whomever I please at whatever price I please. (assuming the buyer agrees on the price)
This includes my own time and labor.

The government would be small, efficient, and have very little to do with the life private civillian

and as i said before, "private property and free market" are a state if government, not a type of government.
though there are governments that are incapable of allowing the system to exist.

Seriously take a walk in Los Amgeles or San Francisco and come back and argue universal suffrage with me.

Which raises the Q of who will be setting the time allotment for each profession? And under what standards will we be using? If we're aiming to have smaller govt, I think it is far more efficient to have a smaller govt via limiting its powers vs limiting the kind of voters or having a voting test

Having freedoms also implies having the freedom to fucking up

Freedom does not guarantee the best results

"Having freedoms also implies having the freedom to fucking up"
this, all of this.

Not just limiting the kind of voters

anarcho capitalism allows for monarchisim because it is a form of private ownership

all ancaps understand this

read some hoppe

Brue you are makeing things up now.

Limiting the kind of people who can hold office

<:ancap_ball:636787271466483712>

If all we're allowed to do and choose in our lives are optimum choices, from being healthy and never drinking, smoking, and only eating broccoli n kale. Is that freedom and a life worth living?

I can see where you logic chain is going, but it is not attached to anything. (brue)

I never argued for that

@TheGhostAgent freedom is only given to you by the state, freedom does not exist in nature

it does, it is just much more volatile.

I argued that social democracy and the ignoramuses who vote in favor of it will be the of freedom

lol.... well then we're at diametrically opposed ideologies here considering I'm from the school of J.Locke where rights are natural to us and recognized/protected by the State.

unless you are going to say that a man is slave to his own needs, and that could be seen as true in a way.

"Protected by the state"

LOCKE was a HACK

... Locke was a hack oh wow... so much wow