Message from @Lucienne d'Anwyl

Discord ID: 674356184094081035


2020-02-04 18:50:40 UTC  

Yea, they're not exactly practicing what they preach

2020-02-04 18:50:59 UTC  

Tell others to go to another business...
Gets kicked off a platform...
Goes to court to sue to try to force the platform to accept them
10/10

2020-02-04 19:02:54 UTC  

Iowa is never important

2020-02-04 19:03:05 UTC  

Sum dumb flyover state

2020-02-04 19:13:30 UTC  

Same dipshit that proclaimed the Democrats wouldn't stand racists in the party and will eject them without hesitation during the Governor Blackface incident.

2020-02-04 20:04:49 UTC  

What the hell they are thinking?

2020-02-04 20:24:38 UTC  

Ah but between him and Weld they chipped of a whole 2.9% off Trump.

2020-02-04 20:24:58 UTC  

So, good job there.

2020-02-04 20:26:21 UTC  

Imagine torching any and all hope of continuing in a career of political punditry to be a laughing stock.

2020-02-04 20:28:49 UTC  

I just want this dipshit to start stumping for M4A just so he gets table scraps from leftists to survive.

2020-02-04 20:43:12 UTC  

Lol

2020-02-04 20:46:01 UTC  

Oof

2020-02-04 20:46:16 UTC  

I’m really glad EVERYONE can vote

2020-02-04 20:48:20 UTC  

Thats fucking hilarious

2020-02-04 20:50:31 UTC  

@TheGhostAgent a false equivalency

2020-02-04 20:50:43 UTC  

a tiny local bakery is just that

2020-02-04 20:50:45 UTC  

one among many

2020-02-04 20:50:52 UTC  

a social media platform is a media monopoly

2020-02-04 20:51:02 UTC  

they have different rights and different expectations

2020-02-04 20:52:27 UTC  

a local bakery isnt sucking the government teat under the pretense of freedom for all

2020-02-04 20:54:36 UTC  

A local bakery answers to different regs as does a social media platform, but that doesn't make either fully unregulated. While a bakery answers to the local health/food ordinance. These platforms answer to the FCC.

The problem is the companies straddling both venues of a 'platform' and 'distributor'. atm there are other alternative media already in existence to compete.
Patreon -> SubscribeStar
YTube -> bitChute
FB -> minds.com
Google -> duckduckgo
Just a few examples.

2020-02-04 20:55:12 UTC  

You might have a point if there can be no existing competitor to come into market

2020-02-04 20:56:29 UTC  

the government doesnt give competitotrs the same benefit it does th eoligarchs

2020-02-04 20:56:38 UTC  

making it a government funded monopoly

2020-02-04 20:57:30 UTC  

Then that's a govt/reg problem, not google. Also, if ppl don't switch their preferred service provider and boycott these corporations, they only have themselves to blame.

2020-02-04 20:58:00 UTC  

hay remember when Sargon went over to SubscribeStar?
remember all the pain SubscribeStar had to deal with because of that?

2020-02-04 20:58:41 UTC  

so while I agree, if a platform can't be changed go out and make your own, there is also a problem where that isn't always an option.

2020-02-04 20:59:41 UTC  

corporations work together to crush competition

2020-02-04 20:59:44 UTC  

Hence when I said there's only a problem if there are no alternatives or an avenue to make one. As for subscribestar having to deal w/it, they got pass it. Now ppl are using it more and patreon is eating dirt.

2020-02-04 20:59:50 UTC  

in dirrect opposition to federal anti trust laws

2020-02-04 21:00:13 UTC  

(also ill point out the answer isn't more government, just tell these platforms they are now counted as publishers if they want to act this way)

2020-02-04 21:00:46 UTC  

The answer of 'govt' is simple.
Choose one. Publisher or Platform, can't have both.

2020-02-04 21:00:53 UTC  

right

2020-02-04 21:01:21 UTC  

youtube for example wants the benifits of bolth with the downsides of nither.

2020-02-04 21:02:21 UTC  

Anti-Sniffing Cone