Message from @TheGhostAgent
Discord ID: 674357160708407333
Same dipshit that proclaimed the Democrats wouldn't stand racists in the party and will eject them without hesitation during the Governor Blackface incident.
What the hell they are thinking?
What a loser, lmao
https://pluralist.com/joe-walsh-iowa-video-backfires/49999
Ah but between him and Weld they chipped of a whole 2.9% off Trump.
So, good job there.
Imagine torching any and all hope of continuing in a career of political punditry to be a laughing stock.
I just want this dipshit to start stumping for M4A just so he gets table scraps from leftists to survive.
Lol
Oof
I’m really glad EVERYONE can vote
Thats fucking hilarious
@TheGhostAgent a false equivalency
a tiny local bakery is just that
one among many
a social media platform is a media monopoly
they have different rights and different expectations
a local bakery isnt sucking the government teat under the pretense of freedom for all
A local bakery answers to different regs as does a social media platform, but that doesn't make either fully unregulated. While a bakery answers to the local health/food ordinance. These platforms answer to the FCC.
The problem is the companies straddling both venues of a 'platform' and 'distributor'. atm there are other alternative media already in existence to compete.
Patreon -> SubscribeStar
YTube -> bitChute
FB -> minds.com
Google -> duckduckgo
Just a few examples.
You might have a point if there can be no existing competitor to come into market
the government doesnt give competitotrs the same benefit it does th eoligarchs
making it a government funded monopoly
Then that's a govt/reg problem, not google. Also, if ppl don't switch their preferred service provider and boycott these corporations, they only have themselves to blame.
hay remember when Sargon went over to SubscribeStar?
remember all the pain SubscribeStar had to deal with because of that?
so while I agree, if a platform can't be changed go out and make your own, there is also a problem where that isn't always an option.
corporations work together to crush competition
Hence when I said there's only a problem if there are no alternatives or an avenue to make one. As for subscribestar having to deal w/it, they got pass it. Now ppl are using it more and patreon is eating dirt.
in dirrect opposition to federal anti trust laws
(also ill point out the answer isn't more government, just tell these platforms they are now counted as publishers if they want to act this way)
The answer of 'govt' is simple.
Choose one. Publisher or Platform, can't have both.
right
youtube for example wants the benifits of bolth with the downsides of nither.
Anti-Sniffing Cone
G/YT/FB, etc. Now if he wants to take the suit on forcing the issue of having the companies choose 1 or FCC to clamp down on them, I'd be all for it. Not for making them accept his content
I agree with that.
You're talk of adhering to protocol is moot when the people on top actively don't, being on the side of "Just make your own platform" escalates all the way to 'make your own government' that's not recourse for improper action within a system
When people prevent you from doing that or cripple possible success to a point it dies
...wut? We appeared to have skipped some lvls here