Message from @randomNPCno3
Discord ID: 663353409298104381
okay well this is an axiom, and sure but as i said i see it more as an anomally and shouldn't be stated as normal human behaviour imo @brett0007wastaken
yeah yeah its fine dw lol
The shit about Plato's forms seems more and more relevant.
how so? and whilst ur typing it im gonna do some multi tasking
About an "ideal form" or "perfect version" of something which exists only in theory. In this case, Communism.
Technically ancom could work if you regress society back to small towns of maybe 100 people
@xlD4NKlx except geed fundamentally is, the asshole apeman on the savannah that can horde the most resorces is the one most lighly to survive, greed is an inherent positive trait an animal because survival above all else is the game
Possibly, you might also need to be very far away from any other towns.
That too
I wonder too how much the regulation of that kind of community owes to everyone believing in a higher power who'll judge them for their misdeeds.
Basically, too many people in the world for communism to be viable anymore
That's why it always ends in genocide
And a higher power is needed, that's why it seems to operate like a theocracy
State=church
@randomNPCno3 it ends in genocide because the autistic fuck in power rees at the fact that his perfect system in there head isnt working and because they are autistic they naturally blames everything under the sun but themselves
That too
It fails for allot of reasons
Not exactly a hard ideology to pick apart
at the base of it all ideologies are easy to pick apart
"pick apart" isn't really the goal, "understand fully" is where you want to head for
group think vs individual think
that's a spectrum, wacka, not a binary
and neither right nor wrong
dunno bout that... even a group of 2 people is group think... anything less is individual think
also by pickapart i meant pedandicly poke holes in till it is the equivilent of a philosophical sieve
a group of 2 people is 2 people capable of conducting group think, individual think, or anywhere inbetween
its "them" vs "us"
commies dont differentiate the individual
who cares about them? they're wrong
if one of "us" drone strikes a country its permissible... but if one of "them" does it.. its bad
or not permissible.... its reasoned
excused
doesn't that depend on the justification?
depends on whether they are an "us" or "them"
wait what
i don't think it does
when Obama deports over 3m people its reasoned/excused ... when Trump deports... whats the tally now? 250k? thats fascism and a dictatorship, and the worst thing ever
actually he might be up to 300k by now
so about 1 tenth