Message from @LogicalTitan
Discord ID: 669253267024379944
for every two steps forward MLK brought us.... Malcom X took us one step back
Malcolm X was pretty woke tbh
Tim Weiner wrote in his history of the FBI that Hoover believed Levison had "indoctrinated King in Marxist thought and subversive strategies", and that King was "part of Moscow's grand design to subvert the United States of America."[
A rabbi who first encountered Levison during the late 1950s, when Levison was abandoning an extended association with the American Communist establishment and completely dedicating himself to King’s movement, reflected with me on the attorney’s turn of heart: “He never said much, and you didn’t even know if he was comfortable with his Jewishness or if that’s what motivated him to work so closely with King. He carried this poignancy for struggling types and, even though he had money, he was searching for something to value. It bothered him that America seemed so largely defined by class. The Communist thing really stalled for him and he realized that it was mostly a falsehood in terms of egalitarianism. It was as if King and Levison were looking for one another. That’s what you thought anyway. Stanley didn’t wax too much about what he was thinking. He had this vast emotional world hidden inside himself. He could have done anything he wanted, backed any cause he chose to back. He swam in conviction when it came to King. He saw a problem and wanted to fix it.”
king said if he had to chose he would vote republican
Further, most of King’s acclaimed speeches were written by others, including his much ballyhooed “I Have a Dream” speech, which was written largely by Jewish leftist activist Stanley Levison.[14] Although this deceptive practice of making presentations as if they are one’s own, without attribution, is widely accepted today, the similar practice of plagiarism is not. King frequently copied the works of others without attribution.[15][16][17] Many of his ghost-written speeches and his writings have parts that are plagiarized, but perhaps most conspicuous was his doctoral dissertation. After years of rumors and hearsay about King’s doctoral plagiarism, Boston University finally commissioned a committee to look into it. It found that as much as 45 percent of the first part of his thesis and 21 percent of the second, was copied from the works of others, without proper attribution.[18] Despite this, the intrepid institution determined that “no thought should be given to the revocation of Dr. King’s doctoral degree.”[19]
He was a fraud.
King would've voted Republican given the Democrat's reputation in the South
Also, of course the FBI at the time would've branded him a communist
. .[W]hen the F.B.I. agents had King under surveillance, they observed him meet a well-identified Soviet espionage agent at the Kennedy Airport in New York. They also secured evidence that King was receiving large sums of money from a well-known American Communist agent who gives King instructions that he implicitly obeys.[40]
However, Michael Laski, the founder of the Communist Party USA (Marxist-Leninist), a splinter group of the Communist Party USA., expounded on King’s commitment to communism when during a press conference held on April 13, 1967, he revealed:
King knows what’s going on. He is allowing himself to be utilized by the Communist Party . . . King willingly enters into an alliance with the Communist Party . . . Mr. King receives support from organizations and individuals that are tied to the Communist Party. He knows what is happening . . .[41]
hmmm didnt know so many of these films were public domain now https://archive.org/details/moviesandfilms
George A Romero's night of the living dead is in public domain.. isnt he still alive?
The film was distributed without a copyright notice and so is considered to have always been public domain
House of Lords will stop it
<:peperage:588019564575457311>
<:poggers:583775485620781087>
<:poggers:583775485620781087>
Im confused by that... immune... Im inferring vaccine .. but then says "treat" all cancer....
Cancer is ignored for the most part by the immune system because it's effectively your own cells going rogue
Maybe they've found a way to flag it to your own immune system as 'bad'
"A newly-discovered part of our immune system could be harnessed to treat all cancers, say scientists.
The Cardiff University team discovered a method of killing prostate, breast, lung and other cancers in lab tests."
from what little I gathered from Vee talking about it.. its some cell that essentially becomes immortal and just keeps dividing and never grows old or dies
oh no... its discovered in the UK ... that means it will be gone after Jan 31st 2020
^its when one of your cells decides to take matters in its own hands
#NotAllCells
only incells are cancer
brilliant
Most of the early womens rights campaigners were slave owners and racists lmao
Quick sweep it under the rug
nothing to see here
they dindu nuffin
``All offenders convicted of preparing or committing a terrorist act will face a minimum of 14 years in jail, more than four times the present three years - and the current rule allowing release of serious terrorists two-thirds of the way through the sentence will be abolished.
They will also face tougher controls on release including lie detector tests that could help prevent a repeat of the London Bridge terror attack where killer Usman Khan is thought to have conned police and probation into thinking he had reformed.``