Message from @Kunarian
Discord ID: 669676921558401054
so... youre equating a guy buying a house.... to a guy buying a person
Yes
like... taking the freedom of another person
because at the time it was the same
Compensation was the ONLY right way to do it. Unlawful seizure of property by the state without compensation would have rent the state in half
At the time it was essentially the same
Compensation was right.
I have to go so quicc
Because people had paid for what they considered property.
If we look at it in a modern sense it would be like someone buying a house only to have the Government take it
And it avoided turning the government into a thug.
It wouldn't be fair
and instead of compensating the person who's freedom was taken... you say we should have compensated the guy who kept that freedom :/
Both should have happened tbh.
They invested in it so yes
You cannot simply seize property that someone owns and not compensate them in an advanced society like late 19th century England and expect the state to survive that
which I'm sure you'll take up
why not?
Not a single citation
Nice one
Citation?
Just Negros writing for their benefit
it would have been how many people not getting compensation?
100?
Are you high Leohte?
" The most important cause of these migrations was probably the slave trade. British involvement in the trade began in the 16th century and had reached huge proportions by the 18th"
Or just illiterate?
Where is the data derived from?
This is Leohte you are talking about
Theres no source in this opinion piece
Bayly, C. A. (ed.), The Raj: Indian and the British 1600-1947, London, 1990
Edwards, P. and Walvin, J., Black Personalities in the Era of the Slave Trade, London, 1983
Fryer, P., Staying Power: The History of Black People in Britain, London, 1984
Newington-Irving, N., 'The Cumbrian (Whitehaven) Slave Trade', in Black and Asian Studies Association Newsletter No. 29, January 2001
Oldham, J., 'New Light on Mansfield and Slavery', Journal of British Studies, 27, 1988
Shyllon, F., Black People in Britain 1555-1833, London, New York, Ibadan, 1977
Visram, R., Asians in Britain: 400 years of History, London, 2002
He is easily one of the most radical racialists on the server
FuRtHeR rEaDiNg
I mean pretty much everyone was against slavery who wasnt super rich...
Is it daily racism hour again?
Eh not true