and instead of compensating the person who's freedom was taken... you say we should have compensated the guy who kept that freedom :/

Both should have happened tbh.

They invested in it so yes

@Kunarian where did you get this nigger number

https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=7ORcaQIgdcEC&pg=PT94&lpg=PT94&dq=%27supposed+to+be+near+20,000...+Negroe+servants%27+in+London:&redir_esc=y&hl=en#v=onepage&q=combed&f=false

https://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/pathways/blackhistory/intro/intro.htm

You cannot simply seize property that someone owns and not compensate them in an advanced society like late 19th century England and expect the state to survive that

The second one has further reading

which I'm sure you'll take up

why not?

Not a single citation

Nice one

Citation?

Just Negros writing for their benefit

it would have been how many people not getting compensation?

100?

Are you high Leohte?

" The most important cause of these migrations was probably the slave trade. British involvement in the trade began in the 16th century and had reached huge proportions by the 18th"

Or just illiterate?

Where is the data derived from?

This is Leohte you are talking about

Theres no source in this opinion piece

Bayly, C. A. (ed.), The Raj: Indian and the British 1600-1947, London, 1990

Edwards, P. and Walvin, J., Black Personalities in the Era of the Slave Trade, London, 1983

Fryer, P., Staying Power: The History of Black People in Britain, London, 1984

Newington-Irving, N., 'The Cumbrian (Whitehaven) Slave Trade', in Black and Asian Studies Association Newsletter No. 29, January 2001

Oldham, J., 'New Light on Mansfield and Slavery', Journal of British Studies, 27, 1988

Shyllon, F., Black People in Britain 1555-1833, London, New York, Ibadan, 1977

Visram, R., Asians in Britain: 400 years of History, London, 2002

He is easily one of the most radical racialists on the server

FuRtHeR rEaDiNg

I mean pretty much everyone was against slavery who wasnt super rich...

Is it daily racism hour again?

Eh not true

what kind of revolt do you think would happen?

Slavery was a complex issue

That doesn't mean they were in favour of eroding property rights

Many people in the UK oppose slavery on principle

I really dont think people were like... ending slavery.. but muh property rights!....

You're wrong

simply

you are

They were more like

Im sure people were more like... muh freedom rights

That is precisely how they viewed it

"Ending slavery? Do you know how much I spent on them?"

muh freedom > muh property