They couldn't just ban it without providing compensation
welll... was it...
they could have compensated "less"
Well think about it, These people have invested money into slavery
Well idk Lizard. Most of the world is pretty fucking racist and anti-semetic. It's only really whites that aren't
They couldn't just essentially steal the money that they had invested
yeah.. they invested money into slavery... tell me why I should care about them 😛
Well OK I guess the Chinese probably don't give a shit about Jews but, they're definitely pretty racist
https://twitter.com/SarahChampionMP/status/1220052731878170624 Another thing Sarah is speaking truth about while no other MP has balls.
Because people shouldn't have things that they have fairly purchased stolen from them without compensation
@Leohte 15,000 Blacks in the UK in 1770s out of 6.4 million Brits. 1/5th of a percent of the population but still more than your arse number.
Same reason the Government shouldn't be able to steal property today
^
so... youre equating a guy buying a house.... to a guy buying a person
Yes
like... taking the freedom of another person
because at the time it was the same
Compensation was the ONLY right way to do it. Unlawful seizure of property by the state without compensation would have rent the state in half
@Kunarian source
At the time it was essentially the same
Compensation was right.
I have to go so quicc
Because people had paid for what they considered property.
If we look at it in a modern sense it would be like someone buying a house only to have the Government take it
And it avoided turning the government into a thug.
It wouldn't be fair
and instead of compensating the person who's freedom was taken... you say we should have compensated the guy who kept that freedom :/
Both should have happened tbh.
They invested in it so yes
@Kunarian where did you get this nigger number
https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=7ORcaQIgdcEC&pg=PT94&lpg=PT94&dq=%27supposed+to+be+near+20,000...+Negroe+servants%27+in+London:&redir_esc=y&hl=en#v=onepage&q=combed&f=false
https://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/pathways/blackhistory/intro/intro.htm
You cannot simply seize property that someone owns and not compensate them in an advanced society like late 19th century England and expect the state to survive that
The second one has further reading
which I'm sure you'll take up
why not?
Not a single citation
Nice one
Citation?
Just Negros writing for their benefit
it would have been how many people not getting compensation?
