Which is why you -must- remove the decision

To be fair to the DWP in this case the person did not attend multiple DWP fit-for-work tests which especially in our current welfare system we can't really allow due to the abuse of the system that it would lead to

Lol I dunno how you think that is my position on welfare @Eccles

Also I still find it funny that people want to remove decisions but then pay people like this peanuts

The problem in these cases is not that they're being paid peanuts, it's that they're having those peanuts removd

We should have some kind of UBI system

Yup

Then these stories would evaporate

Because while we can't have people claiming benefits that they are not entitled to we also can't have a system that just completely cuts off people's sole sources of income

I seem to recall you objecting to UBI on the grounds of the lack of means and entitlement testing, Kunarian

THough I confess, I might be confusing you with someone else on account of being old and forgetful

UBI is wrong

largely because it cannot actually be funded

and also the fact that it takes from the poorest

to spread amongst those who don't need it

it also doesn't target need

single people should not be entitled to the same amount as a family

and the disabled need more than those who aren't disabled

targeting is means-testing

because you are testing what they need

What you're essentially saying then it is inevitable that vulnerable people will die and suffer

And that's a price worth paying to ensure people who don't need support don't get it

Under UBI yes

vulnerable people will die and suffer under UBI

they're dying now

Yep

and in higher numbers

You can't say that

UBI hasn't been implemented

well i could cite test cases, but that wouldn't be fair

UBI wouldn't be cut off

Welfare can be

And is excessively

I don't argue for a welfare system where it can be

Then you probably ought to just end at "The current welfare system is flawed and harms the people it's supposed to protect"

Dunno why I'd need to say that when I can also point out UBI would do the same

you have no proof it would do the same

like you said, it hasn't been tried

so all we can say with certainty is that the current system is flawed

I mean if you're proposing a system that would cut money from people then yeah I feel like I can say it would be worse

except it doesnt