Message from @Hopix
Discord ID: 677871209471279105
alot of other people are clocking onto the plot holes and Freudian slips in this girls interview with sargon, that was bullshit
shes a false victim.
only walked 2miles... I clearly need more exercise 😦
Last time I checked the rape fantasy statistic, it was like 50% admitted to a form of rape fantasy which was I think about 90 women in the study, and about 10 of those at least had them more than 3 times a week. Take all numbers with pinches of salt it’s been a while
Haven’t seen the 90% one so links if you please
as dankula would say
citation?.
Honestly though, 90 people isn't a reliable test group for most things.
even 180 is pretty iffy
I just don't listen to studies with small sample sizes
you need atleast 5000 imo
I bet you could get mad results for that study at a furry convention
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.psychologytoday.com/gb/blog/all-about-sex/201508/why-do-women-have-rape-fantasies%3famp
If this is what @P4GY meant then that 90% is just those that had sexual fantasies in general
so he's lying
typical
ive not got a "rape" fantasy
sounds a bit yikers
Well the study suggests just having one in a year, with 9% of those that admit to having one saying it’s more than 3 times a week
Oh and the total participants were 355 so it’s a decent sample size, and were American undergrads. So results could be down to a hyper fetishised American society and would be interesting to compare culturally.
You need a few thousand spread across an entire country im9
355 is not a good sample size
^
I said decent, not good. As in it’s reasonable. Not nearly enough to actually generalise to everyone
well if you're going to say "all women" id like at least 1% please
even of the host country
350 is like a uni questionnaire
I never said all women? Yeah it’s good enough to establish significance that it’s something that needs greater testing and there’s actually something there to measure
Nothing to generalise
n = 355 has pretty strong statistical power
though would need to read the study
Well this is a nice Valentine's whitepill:
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-lincolnshire-51501202
I fear judges like him are exceptional but with how Common Law works hopefully this is a nice precedent to use against other police services who try to start punishing thoughtcrime
Based judge
More of that please
again
> Mr Miller, 54, also launched a wider challenge against the lawfulness of College of Policing guidelines on hate crimes, which was rejected.
>
> Mr Justice Knowles ruled they "serve legitimate purposes and [are] not disproportionate".
>
> The guidelines define a hate incident as "any non-crime incident which is perceived, by the victim or any other person, to be motivated by a hostility or prejudice against a person who is transgender or perceived to be transgender".
It's a partial win at least
we should collate all available information about this and put it in <#649729722552549396> for sargon to make a video on