Message from @Hopix
Discord ID: 677871189393276938
on that video its not just me commenting this stuff btw lol
alot of other people are clocking onto the plot holes and Freudian slips in this girls interview with sargon, that was bullshit
shes a false victim.
only walked 2miles... I clearly need more exercise 😦
Last time I checked the rape fantasy statistic, it was like 50% admitted to a form of rape fantasy which was I think about 90 women in the study, and about 10 of those at least had them more than 3 times a week. Take all numbers with pinches of salt it’s been a while
Haven’t seen the 90% one so links if you please
as dankula would say
citation?.
Honestly though, 90 people isn't a reliable test group for most things.
even 180 is pretty iffy
I just don't listen to studies with small sample sizes
you need atleast 5000 imo
I bet you could get mad results for that study at a furry convention
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.psychologytoday.com/gb/blog/all-about-sex/201508/why-do-women-have-rape-fantasies%3famp
If this is what @P4GY meant then that 90% is just those that had sexual fantasies in general
so he's lying
typical
ive not got a "rape" fantasy
sounds a bit yikers
Well the study suggests just having one in a year, with 9% of those that admit to having one saying it’s more than 3 times a week
Oh and the total participants were 355 so it’s a decent sample size, and were American undergrads. So results could be down to a hyper fetishised American society and would be interesting to compare culturally.
Imo
355 is not a good sample size
^
I said decent, not good. As in it’s reasonable. Not nearly enough to actually generalise to everyone
well if you're going to say "all women" id like at least 1% please
even of the host country
350 is like a uni questionnaire
I never said all women? Yeah it’s good enough to establish significance that it’s something that needs greater testing and there’s actually something there to measure
Nothing to generalise
n = 355 has pretty strong statistical power
though would need to read the study
Well this is a nice Valentine's whitepill:
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-lincolnshire-51501202
I fear judges like him are exceptional but with how Common Law works hopefully this is a nice precedent to use against other police services who try to start punishing thoughtcrime
Based judge
More of that please
again
> Mr Miller, 54, also launched a wider challenge against the lawfulness of College of Policing guidelines on hate crimes, which was rejected.
>
> Mr Justice Knowles ruled they "serve legitimate purposes and [are] not disproportionate".
>
> The guidelines define a hate incident as "any non-crime incident which is perceived, by the victim or any other person, to be motivated by a hostility or prejudice against a person who is transgender or perceived to be transgender".
It's a partial win at least