Message from @Sq crcl

Discord ID: 680883285341372491


2020-02-22 10:52:49 UTC  

Not only can you measure length and girth, but subsequently volume; the thing that matters most to women. <:smugon:512048583806025739>

@Zephyr Blackfish well one major methodological problem is that most of the available data has too little sample size or very high degree of inaccuracy as a result from it not being an actual measurement of the peni, but it being a self reported size like it is in many countries where you can usually see some cohort of studies in some Frankensteinian way mixed together. Which results in the available data that people lookup everyday. <:smugon:512048583806025739>

2020-02-22 10:55:57 UTC  

So would you recommend state-assigned researchers to fondle and measure on an international scale?

Never, but I do laugh quite a bit when people think the data reflects reality in such a degree that it is useable and somehow in some weird way takes pride in such data and uses it as a mate approach. <:pepelaugh:544857300179877898>

Although one thing for I think I remember reading because our shit professor is a feminist and I needed to make a goddamn report on the accuracy of the data is that generally the Asian data and some European and American data usually are much more accurate than the African, Middle Eastern and South American data.

2020-02-22 11:59:24 UTC  

we need to bring back the Australian Natives' Association tbh

2020-02-22 12:19:03 UTC  

How do you do fellow calm and collected members of the wider society?

2020-02-22 12:54:04 UTC  

Honestly I forget how based the Australian Labor Party was back in the 1890s and 1900s, some Labor politicians speeches were certainly spicy

2020-02-22 12:55:05 UTC  

```“White Australia must not be regarded as a mere political shibboleth. It was Australia’s Magna Carta. Without that policy, this country would have been lost long ere this. It would have been engulfed in an Asian tidal wave. There would have been no need for the Japanese to have invade this country. We would have been swallowed up by the rolling advance of a horde of coloured people, anxious to escape the privations of their own countries and prepared to impose their own standards on this country….

It is necessary only to examine the racial composition of present-day Fiji, where the Hindus have elbowed the natives out of the picture, to visualise what could have happened in this country had the White Australia Policy not been fought for doggedly at the end of the nineteenth century. We were then fighting for our national survival. Had we weakened, the floodgates would have opened and the natural increase of population according to Asian standards would have done the rest. It would then have been too late, this country would have been a push-over for the Asiatics….

Those who advocate admission of coloured labour quotas invariably ignore the economic reasons responsible for the White Australia Policy. While they had their origin in the anxiety of Australian workers to maintain their standards of living, the White Australia Policy has more than justified itself on national security grounds. If this country had admitted Japanese even to the same degree that Honolulu admitted Japanese, what would our position have been in 1942? Would it be safe to admit unlimited numbers of Indonesians, Hindus, or Chinese today?```
-New South Wales Premier (1930-32) and Labor party member Jack Lang

2020-02-22 14:21:01 UTC  

```“I believe in implicitly in the principle of a White Australia, but I do not think it can be maintained simply by waving a sheet of paper containing the dictation test. If we want to preserve it, and I am sure we all do, we shall have to provide means for maintaining it, by force, if necessary. We cannot keep out the people of the Japanese race by means of a dictation test, and we do not want them to come into competition with Australian workers. There would be a public outcry if Parliament removed the present embargo against the introduction of Asiatic labour. What would happen if we cast adrift our defence policy and severed our connection with Great Britain? I do not say that the Japanese would attempt to come here by force of arms, but if we were no party to the scheme of empire-protection, they would certainly insist on the removal of certain provisions in our Immigration Act, and would then invade Australia by the process of peaceful penetration.”```
-James Ogden
Labor party senator in the early 1920s.

2020-02-22 14:23:25 UTC  

hard to believe that Labor was one of the most nationalistic parties in Australia

2020-02-22 14:35:54 UTC  

Christ the Australians were based, I can only wish we had politicians and speakers like that today.

2020-02-22 14:59:38 UTC  

Economically speaking that's no longer realistic. Too many stakeholders in international affairs.

2020-02-22 15:00:25 UTC  

Ideology often follows economics, so yeah.

2020-02-22 15:01:29 UTC  

Unless we experience some sort of global technological setback that makes trading and stuff really hard once again, the ideological trajectory probably won't change.

2020-02-22 20:11:46 UTC  

Oh sweet the channel's back

2020-02-22 20:27:51 UTC  

Woooooo

2020-02-22 21:00:46 UTC  

Should there be a law in place that makes it impossible to impeach a President a second time if they’re acquitted, say similar to double jeopardy? Or should something else be done? Could such a law even be put in place or would it be unconstitutional?

2020-02-22 21:06:33 UTC  

Hey

2020-02-22 21:06:50 UTC  

@Sq crcl how to start his debate?

2020-02-22 21:07:05 UTC  

Dunno, do you want to say something first?

2020-02-22 21:07:48 UTC  

I've come to the conclusion that public schools are just like socialism. it works in the short term but then becomes a virus

2020-02-22 21:07:56 UTC  

Agreed

2020-02-22 21:08:51 UTC  

Ok, let me show you what worries me about it and then you can respond with your ideas, thoughts,questions... Etc and then we go from there.

2020-02-22 21:09:07 UTC  

sure

2020-02-22 21:11:13 UTC  

Public education is shit because the teachers are uninvolved, the syllabus is toxic, the schools are after the government's money and the government only cares about the average of the people not at all any individuals' success other than a prop piece for a commercial on achievement or some bullshit.

How are we doing so far, do we agree? @Kingy200

2020-02-22 21:12:12 UTC  

More to it than just uninvolved but yes we agree

2020-02-22 21:12:25 UTC  

Ok, so therefore...

2020-02-22 21:12:43 UTC  

There are also teacher unions that come in to play

2020-02-22 21:16:59 UTC  

are u typing a book

2020-02-22 21:17:46 UTC  

Un-official *support schools* cropping up due to the vacuum in the market. The education the schools provide is useless, worse than useless for competitiveness.

If we aid these associations, we reward the inept and thieving government's error.

These associations get corrupt over long term.

These associations can't impart licenses and are operating in a grey zone, capped always by the goodwill and patience of the local government.

Homeschooling is the better alternative, for situations where necessary, community schools but never as part of any larger organisation.

2020-02-22 21:18:30 UTC  

Let the free market fix this as well

2020-02-22 21:18:46 UTC  

I'm done. @Kingy200
Sorry, wanted to simplify it.

2020-02-22 21:22:43 UTC  

Well there is no doubt that it would corrupt over time. If private schools get funding they'll have the same problem that public schools did. They'd be doing things for goverment funding because they'll be able to get more. Therefor the goverment will push things it wants tort.

If you change the way the goverment looks at education it would be better i'd like to think. (not sure if it's true but it's worth exploring) what if the goverment wasn't in education at all. Didn't give funding and didn't give test. Just left it to the private market?

2020-02-22 21:23:32 UTC  

I think them increasing the time to respond was a good idea haha

2020-02-22 21:23:48 UTC  

I'm so glad i complained about it

2020-02-22 21:26:52 UTC  

*If private schools get funding they'll have the same problem that public schools did. They'd be doing things for goverment funding because they'll be able to get more. Therefor the goverment will push things it wants tort.*

We see eye to eye, I reckon.

*what if the goverment wasn't in education at all. Didn't give funding and didn't give test. Just left it to the private market?*

This is what I want to see instead of crony-anything 👍

I think we think alike where I'm more skeptical even about some of the actors within the free-er market
(we haven't had freemarket setup for several centuries)

2020-02-22 21:30:15 UTC  

Yeah i'm skeptical about the freemarket aswell. I can see someone coming along that offers these schools money to teach things. (not the goverment). It could be a business or a person with an agenda. If they can get more money what would stop them from doing so.

Also i think there would be less teachers but more better quilty teachers. If the teacher fails the school fails as they loose students.

2020-02-22 21:30:33 UTC  

.

Heck, even the church could run schools better in the 16th century 😸

2020-02-22 21:30:54 UTC  

Hahaha scary but true

2020-02-22 21:35:52 UTC  

*Yeah i'm skeptical about the freemarket aswell.*

Me too, bc of the **human condition** (greed, sloth, env...) .

*It could be a business or a person with an agenda.*

And here we enter nuances. Ie. : if the owner of a small to moderate operations' voluntary CEO and class giver was a biiig family man or woman (idc) then -... Perhaps a *maybe* let's try because we have working ones already.