every single day there is a LGBT group targeting children

My point is that LGBT groups arnt all LGBT people, it doesn’t help that generally conservative environments tend to be negative towards them

I'd say it's the groups that cause the negative environment. I mean nobody is particularly worked up over what you do at home. It's the leatherboys on parade and drag queen story hour that results, I'd say reasonably, in people getting hostile.

I mean when your kid comes home from school talking about transitioning and you, naturally, ask what the holy fuck is going on at that school they tell you what? That it's LGBT rights. A normal person at this point is going to have a fairly negative view of LGBT rights.

WHAT'S THIS, CONVERSATIONS **NOT** ABOUT LESBIANS? FIND OUT MORE TONIGHT AT 7!

i for one, propose we make the big gay illegal

It's more certain individuals that give LGBT a bad name. Unfortunately there are a lot of them. Commonly the voluntary LGBT members, who really just hopped on the train because it's a cultural trend, rather than being said way from the get-go. In turn they've indoctrinated themselves into the church of woke to defend ~~or take advantage of~~ the LGBT community's influence in media. Such as trying to also indoctrinate younger and younger youth without legal repercussions of being the reason of a permanent life choice.

https://twitter.com/slpng_giants/status/1232824802856951808

I came across a verified account that goes after companies which sponsor Dissident Right people and boycotts them/threatens them with Antifa unless they revoke their sponsorship

This is how they are so successful in censorship

@Sq crcl https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hyman_Minsky#Minsky's_financial_instability-hypothesis An alternative, though not a nessarily conflicting hypothesis other than a rising wedge.

Yes, I agree

But regardless, the economy I think is just a reflection on how 'responsible and forward thinking' a nation is. @Comando

Thank you, I'll have to read of his work more

https://www.thetimes.co.uk/edition/news/gays-and-ethnic-minorities-over-represented-on-tv-n7xcqftgz

Come on discord, do your job

sleeping giants are known for that shit. they've been doing this for probably a decade now

they've been pretty effective because companies are pussies

https://www.change.org/p/don-t-hand-assange-over-to-the-u-s

Give him over? Or not?

Dew it.

Yeah, I’m American, let me tell you. He isn’t a criminal, they want to slam him for treason but the guy is Australian IIRC. You can’t be a traitor to America if you aren’t a fucking American.

All they want to do is shut him up so we can’t learn about the inner workings of the deep state.

The information he gives to us, the American public, is a valuable asset. Assange isn’t a traitor. The United States Government is.

Mostly the democrats though.

He's a true patriot.

I think he's a hero

but he did flip out a bit after years of self imposed confinement. I do think he's very biased now and deliberately tried to ruin hillary and get trump elected. initially when I learned this I was horrified, but now I completely understand

I think Edward Snowden is a hero, but not Assange. Wikileaks has inserted tons of false information in to each leak they've covered, and other websites cover the same information. Meanwhile he leaked CIA agents name's and other pertinent informaton, as well as still is hosting the dox of numerous law enforcement agents, including from ICE and the ATF

https://www.lawenforcementtoday.com/wikileaks-doxes-9243-ice-agents/
https://www.dailysignal.com/2018/06/20/antifa-spreads-list-of-ice-agents-compiled-using-linkedin-and-blasts-it-over-twitter/

The famous "Iraq War logs" video supposedly showing the U.S. killing civilians was also doctored, deliberately by wikileaks and this was all done under Assange's direction. He specifically is a piece of shit

"According to Harnden "Assange admitted that he was seeking to manipulate and create 'maximum political impact'."[60][61][62][63][64] Dan Kennedy wrote in The Guardian, "Even the comedian Stephen Colbert, in an interview with Assange, dropped his rightwing-blowhard persona momentarily to make a serious point, calling the edited version 'emotional manipulation'""
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/July_12,_2007,_Baghdad_airstrike#WikiLeaks'_rationale_for_their_title_of_the_footage

@Monstrous Moonshine shocking.

Hey guys I think this might be dumb idea but I want to here what you think. I think we should publicize lawyers & the legal system in general (I.E NO private lawyers) and also pay them solely on how many cases they win.

The way they would be paid is wrong

How so?

Because it's not about how many cases they win

What is. it about then? I think there should still be some sort of incentive for them to win there cases. I wouldent want the goverment to coroce lawers into giving them favorable results.

It's called the justice system for a reason