Message from @Uksio
Discord ID: 681497228069699714
because the commies thought they can divert rivers willy nilly
Diverting a river to make a greener desert is a bad thing how?
and they started returning to their old banks
through fields and settlements
it's not even about diverting, you literally would have to build river bridges
Ah yes soBiet floods
Depends where your in the world your doing this I guess
and you would see scenes of a river flowing above arable lands across the dams
@Camera Obscura From T-ball?
Because engineers were so afraid of goolags they would rather implement the clearly flawed decision of retard superiors
If your in a heavy ecologically sensitive area like Europe ya I wouldn’t do it
although i saw in NL where they let one canal flow over another
Isn't soBiets great?
Oh wait they ded
not sure how viable this would be large-scale tho
If your moving water into a desert maybe it be more acceptable then
it's one thing to un-flood netherlands, it's quite another to make the north sea disappear
Humans diverted water for centuries now
yeah
it'd be like a little country if they dried it up lol
someone would get the dam and say you pay us or we floodya 😛
"little"
also, I'm pretty sure it'd get divvied up between neighbours, not a new country
@Uksio I think your talking about the Aral Sea, last I checked the Caspian’s doing okay
This was an idea before it fizzled out
@XoviaHarmile oh yeah I mix those up
>build a dam
>create the most progressive state with open borders
>make all leftists move there
>break the dam
Caspian is just radioactive
Lol
No shit look it up
I’m a bit surprised there still mines
Maybe from ww2
SoBiets did hundreds of nuke testings in Caspian sea
You think those were dummy rockets?