Message from @unwoundtoast

Discord ID: 630309682220892160


2019-10-06 07:38:57 UTC  

Implicit consent does not necessarily beget enforcement

2019-10-06 07:39:06 UTC  

Consider the case of the man kissing his wife

2019-10-06 07:39:31 UTC  

I'm not talking about men and women. I am talking about discord.

2019-10-06 07:39:53 UTC  

If you’re not talking about whether implicit consent is coercive or not, fuck off

2019-10-06 07:40:10 UTC  

@Anastasia savvy?

2019-10-06 07:40:48 UTC  

I am talking about whether implied consent is coercive in Discord. Or YOU fuck off.
Savvy, mate?

2019-10-06 07:41:06 UTC  

Does the location change whether it is or isn’t coercive?

2019-10-06 07:41:15 UTC  

If not, it’s an irrelevant distinction

2019-10-06 07:41:23 UTC  

Says you.

2019-10-06 07:41:35 UTC  

If so, I reject the posit on the grounds it is the relativists position and is thus untenable

2019-10-06 07:41:38 UTC  

Because I said so isn't a very strong position.

2019-10-06 07:41:55 UTC  

Why is it relevant if the location does not change it?

2019-10-06 07:42:02 UTC  

Burden is upon you to show relevance

2019-10-06 07:42:36 UTC  

Why is such a distinction necessary supposing location is irrelevant?

2019-10-06 07:43:18 UTC  

Relevance of a discussion about discord? Hmmmmm..... I'll guess anything to do with implied consent of a discord server would be relevant.

2019-10-06 07:44:05 UTC  

A location other than discord, would need to be shown to be relevant. So.. .....

2019-10-06 07:44:32 UTC  

It’s relevant because location does not impact whether implicit consent is necessarily coercive

2019-10-06 07:44:54 UTC  

Otherwise is the relativists position

2019-10-06 07:45:14 UTC  

Does it though? I mean, in your kissing example. How do you know there wasn't explicit consent?

2019-10-06 07:45:33 UTC  

There can be

2019-10-06 07:45:38 UTC  

Let’s look at both cases

2019-10-06 07:45:46 UTC  

I'm guessing implicit consent is used to sexually assault someone by kissing them.

2019-10-06 07:45:53 UTC  

Where there is and where there is not explicit consent

2019-10-06 07:46:02 UTC  

But that's here nor there. Discord.

2019-10-06 07:46:28 UTC  

Did you not ask that question in earnest?

2019-10-06 07:46:32 UTC  

That’s disingenuous

2019-10-06 07:47:01 UTC  

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/492157062797590531/630310029924237322/image0.png

2019-10-06 07:47:04 UTC  

No. Because it's collateral to the subject matter. It seems that you want to get off the subject matter

2019-10-06 07:47:18 UTC  

You asked the question

2019-10-06 07:47:19 UTC  

Not me

2019-10-06 07:47:34 UTC  

Like I said.... I'd like to talk about Discord.

2019-10-06 07:47:44 UTC  

Then why did you ask?

2019-10-06 07:47:48 UTC  

That’s on you

2019-10-06 07:47:59 UTC  

Are you disingenuous, or shall I answer?

2019-10-06 07:48:02 UTC  

Nope. Not going down the distraction

2019-10-06 07:48:12 UTC  

Then you have been disingenuous

2019-10-06 07:48:28 UTC  

Subject matter is discord and it's implied consent.

2019-10-06 07:48:34 UTC  

There is no grounds from which one argues against a disingenuous man

2019-10-06 07:48:41 UTC  

Oh please.

2019-10-06 07:48:53 UTC  

You aren’t here to argue, clearly

2019-10-06 07:49:04 UTC  

I reject your posit