Because I said so isn't a very strong position.

Why is it relevant if the location does not change it?

Burden is upon you to show relevance

Why is such a distinction necessary supposing location is irrelevant?

Relevance of a discussion about discord? Hmmmmm..... I'll guess anything to do with implied consent of a discord server would be relevant.

A location other than discord, would need to be shown to be relevant. So.. .....

It’s relevant because location does not impact whether implicit consent is necessarily coercive

Otherwise is the relativists position

Does it though? I mean, in your kissing example. How do you know there wasn't explicit consent?

There can be

Let’s look at both cases

I'm guessing implicit consent is used to sexually assault someone by kissing them.

Where there is and where there is not explicit consent

But that's here nor there. Discord.

Did you not ask that question in earnest?

That’s disingenuous

No. Because it's collateral to the subject matter. It seems that you want to get off the subject matter

You asked the question

Not me

Like I said.... I'd like to talk about Discord.

Then why did you ask?

That’s on you

Are you disingenuous, or shall I answer?

Nope. Not going down the distraction

Then you have been disingenuous

Subject matter is discord and it's implied consent.

There is no grounds from which one argues against a disingenuous man

Oh please.

You aren’t here to argue, clearly

I reject your posit

Go away

Disingenuous cunt

*tries to go onto a tangent*
*and calls me disingenuous*.

You asked

Moron

Idiot. I was making a point that it was a distraction and now youre trying to make it the main issue. That's the true disingenuousnesss.

Subject matter is discord and it's implied consent.

You asked a question then stated you did not want to discuss the subject of the question

You are a disingenuous shit