Message from @unwoundtoast
Discord ID: 630307999503745024
Unenforceability is coercion?
Is that your argument?
Because if the one trying to enforce the contract, is using a nullity, the very thought of it being an enforceable contract is coercion.
Is unenforceability grounds to classify a thing as coercive?
Illegitimate enforcement is grounds to classify a thing as coercive.
Agreed, but again, implicit consent is not the enforcement thereof
Will you admit this or not?
Unenforceability means no there is no contract.
Will you admit or not?
To what? That implied consent isn't a contract? Yes. Implied consent also implies enforcement to a statist. (One that uses might makes right)
Implied consent IS enforcement.
That implication is incorrect
I reject it
Please explain.
I reject that implicit consent confers enforcement, and unless you consider yourself a statist by your logic, I presume you agree
Ergo I believe you’ve called your own arguments herein irrelevant
Because you agree that implicit consent is not the enforcement thereof
Ergo implicit consent is not coercive
Why do you reject it?
Because it is incorrect
Explain your claim.
Consider the case of the man kissing his wife
I'm not talking about men and women. I am talking about discord.
If you’re not talking about whether implicit consent is coercive or not, fuck off
@Anastasia savvy?
I am talking about whether implied consent is coercive in Discord. Or YOU fuck off.
Savvy, mate?
Does the location change whether it is or isn’t coercive?
If not, it’s an irrelevant distinction
Says you.
If so, I reject the posit on the grounds it is the relativists position and is thus untenable
Because I said so isn't a very strong position.
Why is it relevant if the location does not change it?
Burden is upon you to show relevance
Why is such a distinction necessary supposing location is irrelevant?
Relevance of a discussion about discord? Hmmmmm..... I'll guess anything to do with implied consent of a discord server would be relevant.
A location other than discord, would need to be shown to be relevant. So.. .....
It’s relevant because location does not impact whether implicit consent is necessarily coercive
Otherwise is the relativists position
Does it though? I mean, in your kissing example. How do you know there wasn't explicit consent?
There can be
Let’s look at both cases