Message from @Anastasia
Discord ID: 630309713212473355
Consider the case of the man kissing his wife
I'm not talking about men and women. I am talking about discord.
If you’re not talking about whether implicit consent is coercive or not, fuck off
@Anastasia savvy?
I am talking about whether implied consent is coercive in Discord. Or YOU fuck off.
Savvy, mate?
Does the location change whether it is or isn’t coercive?
If not, it’s an irrelevant distinction
Says you.
If so, I reject the posit on the grounds it is the relativists position and is thus untenable
Because I said so isn't a very strong position.
Why is it relevant if the location does not change it?
Burden is upon you to show relevance
Why is such a distinction necessary supposing location is irrelevant?
Relevance of a discussion about discord? Hmmmmm..... I'll guess anything to do with implied consent of a discord server would be relevant.
A location other than discord, would need to be shown to be relevant. So.. .....
It’s relevant because location does not impact whether implicit consent is necessarily coercive
Otherwise is the relativists position
Does it though? I mean, in your kissing example. How do you know there wasn't explicit consent?
There can be
Let’s look at both cases
Where there is and where there is not explicit consent
But that's here nor there. Discord.
Did you not ask that question in earnest?
That’s disingenuous
No. Because it's collateral to the subject matter. It seems that you want to get off the subject matter
You asked the question
Not me
Like I said.... I'd like to talk about Discord.
Then why did you ask?
That’s on you
Are you disingenuous, or shall I answer?
Nope. Not going down the distraction
Then you have been disingenuous
Subject matter is discord and it's implied consent.
There is no grounds from which one argues against a disingenuous man
Oh please.
You aren’t here to argue, clearly
I reject your posit
Go away