And Tor is easy to set up, even for an old ass boomer like me

This is temporary. Dark web but not totally dark.

@Margot can you edit that saying what the link is and I'll pin it?

Tor link to Daily Stormer is http://dstormer6em3i4km.onion/

so real talk

is this *actually* illegal

thanks @Margot

or does google somehow have the rights to do this

Legal is working on it

@Marie Woods good work thank you for your service

I've basically edited the HOSTS file to gain access to the DS so I don't have to use Tor.

@Nationalist4UK IP address will still work, right?

but cloudflare blocks access directly from the IP address, but you have to edit the HOSTS file, only the BBS works

oh ok

but it won't make much of a difference as I read articles via the BBS

lol came into the store of the client I have today

and they had left a book about modern day socialism on my area I usually work

Is gab down for anyone else?

just photo documented that it was there and thanked them "for the literature as I believe it's important to expand knowledge to the fullest extent and be educated on stances you disagree with"

then put it in my bag, lmao

you shoudl have lit that shit on fire in front of them

^

I took this black CDR playing basketball today. I looked down at him and said "that's for Lee"

Rose Mary Woods?

That 2nd part didn't happen

Nixon's secretary?

But i thought it

I did knock him on the ground pretty hard tho. Felt great

God damn it you guys fucked it. The shitlibs are going to introduce hate speech laws for Arkansas next session.

I enjoyed my quiet little backwoods state and now theu remembered we dont have a hate speech law on the book.

Do you think that'll actually go anywhere?

that's a whole nothing burger

This is just the highest levels of signalling they can try to muster

I can see the shitlibs greasing palms to get it done and republicans going along with it to keep thier heads low.

It's literally illegal, ACLU will take it to SCOTUS

because trump could use it shut down the left

@Wall Buildionaire If weev is right and it's nothing to do with their TOS other than a general ability to block anyone they want to then they lied, which for all I know is illegal for a company to do. If it's not even possible by their TOS then that's possibly worse. I'm not a lawyer, not sure.

Because they claimed DS violated their TOS, so if there's nothing in their policy DS have violated then they've lied, which is slander or something at least, and for all I know it's something more severe.

That's what I understand happened