Message from @Thomas the Sowell Train [USA]
Discord ID: 422481808689594380
Pretty sure Mother Jones has used that skewed definition in the past tho
`Lethal force is that force which may cause death or grave bodily harm. Grave bodily harm is also defined as crippling injury. You do not fire the gun unless you are on solid legal ground if you kill the citizen you are defending yourself from.
"THE CIRCUMSTANCE WHICH JUSTIFIES HOMICIDE IS IMMEDIATE AND OTHERWISE UNAVOIDABLE DANGER OF DEATH OR GRAVE BODILY HARM TO THE INNOCENT."
Citizens do not fire warning shots.
Warning shots seem like a great idea until one considers that when you're "warning" him, you're actually using lethal force directed toward an individual to make your warning. MA recounts the sad tale of a man who fired a warning shot over another man's head and struck a distant woman, killing her. There is also the case of a musician who, while legally intoxicated, became confused and beat on his neighbor's door so violently the man fired a warning shot through the top of the door. Unfortunately the musician was extraordinarily tall and the "warning shot" was a "head shot."
These are cases of people possessing power that they do not know how to command, and tragedy was the result. If you must pull your gun, be prepared to fire it. If you must fire it, aim it to stop the threat to your life or the lives of innocents. There is no other acceptable use of lethal force.
MA is not an attorney. His is not a law professor. MA is a designated prosecutor with the Grantham police department in New Hampshire. He is a lethal force instructor. In any given year MA will accept and take to trial about 20 cases, where he will act as an expert witness. They seem to split evenly on citizens firing in self defense and police officers firing their weapons in the line of duty. MA does not take cases where he is not reasonably certain, by the evidence, that the defendant is innocent. `
https://i.imgur.com/dU4LqLL.mp4
Not exactly firearms but woahhhh
what could possibly go wrong
De_Omnibus β’ 365 points β’ submitted 3 hours ago
The C130 crashed during testing, the front firing rockets blinded the pilots.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Credible_Sport?wprov=sfla1
multiple rockets like that are always dangerous. All it takes is *one* of them to fail to fire, to have a delayed ignition, or just not to burn as clean as the other ones and everything can go awry
Germans used solid rocket boosters during the war and it cost them, too
Hi, I'm Johnny Knoxville and this is. Save some hostages in Iran.
Says here this is why they developed the V-22 Osprey
Which seems much more sensible an idea
Found out my congressman is a cosponsor for this π https://www.congress.gov/bill/115th-congress/house-bill/5087/text?q=%7B%22search%22%3A%5B%22huffman%22%5D%7D
fuck commiefornia
@Thomas the Sowell Train [USA] you're in commiefornia? god bless your soul
the bill bans all AKs, all ARs, and a slew of other guns
looks like it bans any ammunition feeder of more than 10 rounds
"SEC. 5. BACKGROUND CHECKS FOR TRANSFERS OF GRANDFATHERED SEMIAUTOMATIC ASSAULT WEAPONS."
who the fuck wrote this????
>semiautomatic assault weapons
Jesus Christo this is some dumb shit.
when can california be sued?
just cut off their water π
It was an interesting idea until it literally crashed and burned
Not easy to train the pilots for it.
This MRAP took two fucking RPGs and still dgaf. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ThFZ-TX2bc8
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bnoFKskvSq4
Canadians be like "Why is this so hard for you Americans?!"
Isn't California where those three girls got murdered with a pitchfork because they didn't have access to their parent's firearm that was locked up in a safe?
Oh shit, somebody in the Ministry of Truth will be unpersoned for this.
<:think_woke:378717098681171988>
It has the tactical 12 gauge shotgun attachment.
funny you mention that actually
I'm surprised the firearms industry at large hasn't made more of an effort to make their firearms look and sound less scary
If you're being prosecuted for killing someone in a home invasion, wouldn't you prefer the jury saw you used a Browning BPS (with a wood stock and pump action) or something like a Benelli SuperNova pump action (which is all black and literally has *TACTICAL* engraved into the side of it)
It'd be easy to dismiss that as 'nah the layman hates all guns' but we've already seen how many times someone is totally cool with a wood-finished M14 but then flips when they see everyone's favourite boogeyman, the AR-15