Message from @Fitzydog
Discord ID: 471888343093739520
I have a raging boner from this right now
holy shit
freedom
It creates precedent for the whole 9th circuit, allowing their public open carry laws to be challenged
I'm starting to like this scotus already
@AiarUther It was just a lower 9th circuit court, with only 3 judges
ah
still, it's a good day
Yes, I read it over, and it's pretty broad. Not much counter argument other than "Muh proliferation of guns"
I think lefties have realised that falsely interpreting the second ammendment doesn't work anymore
california can suck a dick
Even if you can play fast and loose with the language in the 2nd ammendment, the intent is clear
ALTHOUGH!!!
And this is important...
There *is* a legal standing for banning concealed carry, and it is well established.
what is it?
still seems to run into "shall not be infringed"
It's a pretty old historical basis going back before even the 2nd amendment, and the founders would have been well aware of the ban of concealed carry in urban areas
is there any reason to believe the founding fathers woud not support the right to conceal and carry?
Yes, there's old case law quoted in there where it was upheld in the early era
To sum up, concealed carry was only accepted in the modern era as a compromise for not having open carry, and because of public fear
I thought the point of conceal and carry was to protect people in certain circumstances
lol just read the wiki
it's pretty fascinating
I mean if I'm going to hold up a liquor store, I'm going to crack a bottle over the head of the guy that I can see own's a gun
and then hold up the store
Conceal and Carry protects me from that
*We* understand concealed carry today, but *historically* it was considered unethical
I suppose in the early 19th century, concealing a caplock or flint lock pistol would be hard
It has precedent going back to English common law applying even to cane swords lol
but I think avoiding attack from a concealed weapon is simple
don't attack folks
<:makes_you_think:382980749780844554>
it's like avoiding being shot for trespassing
I'm not arguing in favor of it, I'm just explaining the historical context lol
fair enough
open carry is better than nothing
TFW I still live in australia
;_;
that guy is pressing on the peruta issue