Message from @Fitzydog

Discord ID: 471886778496712714


2018-07-26 00:49:48 UTC  

finally SCOTUS knows what "keep and bear arms" means

2018-07-26 00:51:27 UTC  

There is literally only one gun store that sells handguns in Toronto

2018-07-26 00:52:13 UTC  

I wonder what counts as "open carry"

2018-07-26 00:52:21 UTC  

and what counts as "conceal and carry"

2018-07-26 00:54:42 UTC  

Correction: only one *store* that sells handguns. It isn't even a gun store

2018-07-26 00:54:57 UTC  

I mean if I have an open holster closer to my back hip and I put a long coat on

2018-07-26 00:55:07 UTC  

does that count as conceal and carry?

2018-07-26 01:02:33 UTC  

Problem solved!

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/385307110813990913/471844745736355841/received_10212398574899558.jpeg

2018-07-26 02:03:47 UTC  

@Fitzydog but that's illegal in cali

2018-07-26 02:03:58 UTC  

you need to jump through a bunch of hoops for that

2018-07-26 02:04:30 UTC  

For what?

2018-07-26 02:06:10 UTC  

lol what? In Portland this would be the only legal way to open carry. Concealing the bullets is considered 'concealed carry'

2018-07-26 03:46:44 UTC  

anyway

2018-07-26 03:47:46 UTC  

I have a raging boner from this right now

2018-07-26 03:48:12 UTC  

holy shit

2018-07-26 03:48:27 UTC  

freedom

2018-07-26 03:49:04 UTC  

It creates precedent for the whole 9th circuit, allowing their public open carry laws to be challenged

2018-07-26 03:49:08 UTC  

I'm starting to like this scotus already

2018-07-26 03:49:35 UTC  

@AiarUther It was just a lower 9th circuit court, with only 3 judges

2018-07-26 03:49:41 UTC  

ah

2018-07-26 03:49:51 UTC  

still, it's a good day

2018-07-26 03:50:22 UTC  

Yes, I read it over, and it's pretty broad. Not much counter argument other than "Muh proliferation of guns"

2018-07-26 03:51:00 UTC  

I think lefties have realised that falsely interpreting the second ammendment doesn't work anymore

2018-07-26 03:51:01 UTC  

california can suck a dick

2018-07-26 03:51:43 UTC  

Even if you can play fast and loose with the language in the 2nd ammendment, the intent is clear

2018-07-26 03:51:50 UTC  

ALTHOUGH!!!

And this is important...

2018-07-26 03:52:13 UTC  

There *is* a legal standing for banning concealed carry, and it is well established.

2018-07-26 03:52:29 UTC  

what is it?

2018-07-26 03:52:42 UTC  

still seems to run into "shall not be infringed"

2018-07-26 03:53:38 UTC  

It's a pretty old historical basis going back before even the 2nd amendment, and the founders would have been well aware of the ban of concealed carry in urban areas

2018-07-26 03:54:25 UTC  

is there any reason to believe the founding fathers woud not support the right to conceal and carry?

2018-07-26 03:54:55 UTC  

Yes, there's old case law quoted in there where it was upheld in the early era

2018-07-26 03:55:48 UTC  

To sum up, concealed carry was only accepted in the modern era as a compromise for not having open carry, and because of public fear

2018-07-26 03:56:27 UTC  

I thought the point of conceal and carry was to protect people in certain circumstances

2018-07-26 03:56:41 UTC  

lol just read the wiki

2018-07-26 03:56:49 UTC  

it's pretty fascinating

2018-07-26 03:57:20 UTC  

I mean if I'm going to hold up a liquor store, I'm going to crack a bottle over the head of the guy that I can see own's a gun

2018-07-26 03:57:25 UTC  

and then hold up the store