But they had Battlefield 1. There is obviously a right and wrong way to do a trailer

There was no music in this trailer either

There was nothing to get hyped about, it was just... stuff happening, then the audience trying to process it

If it didn't have Battlefield V in the title people would tear this trailer even harder for being so fucking autistic

Yeah, it's a bad trailer

No one can deny that

yeep

I was thinking here....

Ea is going to do with this game the same shit they do with their sport games

If you guys know how absurd they are you will understand

How absurd the micro transactions are*

Let's make a realistic shooter, FUCK IT, THROW IN STEAMPUNK PROSTETICS.

Since history doesn't fuck matter, can we get some F-16s too?

or X-Wings?

They will probably add weapons from the 50 who were prototypes in the 40s

So, get ready for some ak 43

I wanna see some X-16-Wings fighting some B-35-Blimp Flying Fortresses.

Or even the 47

https://www.reddit.com/r/Battlefield/comments/8mdhwn/bfv_star_wars_character_looks_more_like_a_ww2/

Why the fuck is the Reddit toolbar broken for me

It goes way off to the side of the page and I can't select anything

Just use Old Reddit

welp, now that I've watched the trailer

I can see why people dislike it

Don't claim realism and then give us Dirty Dozen 2018 edition

But naw, it's `the sexism`

Looks and sounds pretty though

Which makes me feel bad for the people who put all the effort into those aspects

I can't remember the last Battlfield game I played

I think it was 1942 with some mods

lel

https://www.pcgamer.com/the-weirdest-patch-notes-of-2017/

```Some general improvements to zombie jumping
Fixed: Snakes are fireproof```

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kytaUho4iPw

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oth-Ygi1sHM

@Fulcrum010 @Werlf @Ϻ14ᛟ

lmao

Lel