Message from @DanielKO
Discord ID: 410470127524642818
@Broo TulsiGang 2024 🇬🇧 🇺🇸 wot dis
fun times
inb4 butthurt theists
Because explaining it to Buddhists is easier? What about to Sikhs? Satan worshipers? African shamans?
inb4 atheists die out due to low birth rates
Try to explain falsifiability to atheists that think they can *prove* there's no God.
how did I know you'd be reeing all over this the instant it was posted, @DanielKO ? <:LUL:372856126007410689>
I'm not REEEing, I'm just pointing out the intellectual flaw in the joke.
also, "atheism" wasn't genetic last I checked.
you're butthurt any time someone paints superstitious idiocy in the light it deserves, unlesss that particular superstition is islam
Islam is preferable to atheism
"you're butthurt", look who's REEEEing...
come back to me when you've understood who the burden of proof rests on DKO
The simple fact you want to lump everything with Islam, means you're no smarter than Trudeau that lumps all immigrants with ISIS.
Let me play Hitchens' trump card, Atheism is a Religion. Done. Proved it's evil too.
who's lumping everything together with islam?
You do know why people say "Abrahamic" religions, don't you?
I mentioned islam, because it's an abrahamic religion, numbnuts
which is in the meme
It's an attempt to group Islam with Judaism and Christianism.
"an attempt"
it's grouped with those two whether you like it or not, I'm afraid
Judaism share traditions and religious texts with Christianity.
I didn't say it was just as bad, but you really, really want to make it out like I did, don't you?
Islam shares zero of either with either of the religions.
No gotcha for you I'm afraid
yeah, sure
Islam has no traditions related to Judeo-Christian traditions. The Quran has nothing that's either on the Torah or the Bible.
It just borrowed some character names, then Muhammad-the-camel-piss-drinker made up stories about them.
"camel-piss-drinker"
lol
It's in the Quran, are you laughing at the Quran?
I've laughed at it before, so why not again?
That was sarcasm.
Oh really?
So, try refuting my two points.