Message from @Ondsinet

Discord ID: 541809353171271691


2019-02-03 17:48:12 UTC  

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/532966360519802890/541676294878789652/image0-28.jpg

2019-02-03 19:45:13 UTC  

<:oof:494878589406150657>

2019-02-03 20:05:51 UTC  

There was an older theory that native americans in the east part of North America were Europeans, but this is suprising

2019-02-03 20:53:54 UTC  

nice

2019-02-04 02:28:20 UTC  

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uqKGREZs6-w Lets colonize mars, because its worth it for.... reasons

2019-02-04 02:28:23 UTC  

#GermanLogic

2019-02-04 02:29:28 UTC  

<:pepeping:466401908811235329>

2019-02-04 02:29:36 UTC  

Should be USA logic

2019-02-04 02:29:57 UTC  

Before the Ching Chongs get there

2019-02-04 02:35:37 UTC  

nah, the USA will land on mars, succeed in a return trip (after a few failed tries)

2019-02-04 02:35:44 UTC  

and then public will lose interest, just like the moon landings

2019-02-04 02:35:48 UTC  

because there's no profit in going to mars

2019-02-04 02:36:06 UTC  

also it says 'nuclear power will exist on the mars colony for the first 3 years or so"

2019-02-04 02:36:11 UTC  

why not permanent nuclear power? lol

2019-02-04 02:36:21 UTC  

wasn't there something about mining the moon for nuclear resources

2019-02-04 02:36:25 UTC  

i dunno

2019-02-04 02:36:42 UTC  

it seems like all other energy sources on mars are completely unfeasible besides nuclear power

2019-02-04 02:36:56 UTC  

Because it would require shipping fissile material and reactors from earth

2019-02-04 02:37:05 UTC  

and walking outside could probably only be done once per week or once per month, due to having to filter out all the dust

2019-02-04 02:37:09 UTC  

Whish wouldn't be cost or time effective at all

2019-02-04 02:37:16 UTC  

and having suits that are left ouside is dumb.... how do they maintain them?

2019-02-04 02:37:45 UTC  

the entire mars venture isn't time effective or cost effective lol

2019-02-04 02:37:50 UTC  

But yeah colonizing Venus seems more feasible

2019-02-04 02:38:01 UTC  

why venus??

2019-02-04 02:38:05 UTC  

Sun

2019-02-04 02:38:09 UTC  

oh solar power?

2019-02-04 02:38:12 UTC  

is that it?

2019-02-04 02:38:12 UTC  

lol

2019-02-04 02:38:21 UTC  

i mean we can't really terraform venus either

2019-02-04 02:38:26 UTC  

but whatever

2019-02-04 02:39:35 UTC  

Honestly just build a ton of solar panels on some planet and Beam power back to earth

2019-02-04 02:43:55 UTC  

lol

2019-02-04 02:44:01 UTC  

i guess

2019-02-04 02:44:15 UTC  

not as efficient as oil tho maybe

2019-02-04 02:44:19 UTC  

or nuclear power

2019-02-04 02:44:33 UTC  

I wrote this comment in the kurgeCRINGE mars video
-----------------------------

2019-02-04 02:44:35 UTC  

2019: Debut some spaceship.
2020: Get more investors.
2021: Deliver more hot air.
2022: Get more investors.
2023: Sweep 10 more failed ventures under the rug, and bribe the media to 'forget' about it.
2024: Get more investors.
2025: Start a minor LEO space tourism venture.
2026: Get more investors.
2027-2035: Virtue signal more and more about Mars as investors dump in money.
2036: "Go to Mars" reality TV show is a flop. There's is a plan to go home, but some things go wrong, and the whole crew dies.
2060: Elon Musk refuses to retire, but is so senile that he can no longer give coherent speeches. This continues for a year or so until all investors have finally lost confidence. No one now mentions Elon Musk, except in the past tense.
2037 - 2088: A handful of more ventures occur, driven by entrepreneurs who were inspired by Elon and charismatic enough to attract continued investment. Mars mania is about to fade until some crews succeed in return trips, but no venture is taken beyond this. The thrill is lost by 2087 or so. This is just like the moon landing.
The Next 1000 Years: No one cares about Mars beyond tourism possibilities or science. Space stations orbit above mars, to send probes down to collect samples. The probes then blast off back to the space station above, to deliver the samples back to the lab. That sorta thing.

The moon however? There is a future on the moon, IMO; even a few permanent colonies. The distance makes it more economically feasible, and there was an argument for benefit to industry.