Message from @folk
Discord ID: 383930203786706955
jesus the historical figure probably existed but his name wasn't jesus and obviously most of the events attributed to him were exaggerated or fabricated
There's some evidence that Jesus existed, and it wasn't just a random dude that happened to be called Jesus, it was the Jesus that lead to the creation of Christianity. You can argue whether he had magical powers or not, but there's just about as much evidence of him existing and appearing in public as most other figures of antiquity.
the name jesus literally did not exist yet
jesus is a greek version of jeshua which is the aramaic form of joshua, which is hebrew
there are no historical records of jesus of nazareth outside of the bible
there are records of people with the same name, but it was a very common name
something like turning water to wine was probably noteworthy enough to mention *somewhere*
The Jews also recorded it.
>Paul R. Eddy has stated that as Rome's preeminent historian, Tacitus was generally known for checking his sources and was not in the habit of reporting gossip.
whoops.
nearly forgot to vote
probably says something about the general enthusiasm for this election tho
@Durtle02 "bullshit!!!!"
Lol
how the fuck does it have 9k likes
they can say whatever they want, and then they can do whatever they want (even if it contradicts what they told you) without you knowing what the hell they're doing
that's what a private company can do, I will never understand americans
Yeah! Trust us, we're Comcast, you have our word 😉
Comcast is senpai
Comcast : Bend over
I just upgraded to 1gb internet for 70
Its not all bad
There wouldnt be a problem If there were many ISP in a region
I just think is is a massive overreaction
There will be cons and pros
Gotchya, Dan 😉
There are legitimate conserns
But NN was only in place for two years
The ISP acted like there was NN before it was passed in 2015
I havent seen any fracturing before it was made official
that's probably not accurate - what you should say is "we presume ISPs acted like there was NN before 2015", because american ISPs/telecoms were actively engaged in lobbying to _stop_ net neutrality being implemented in europe from 2004 and onwards until it was enacted around 2011
NN is protected here in Europe
The image you have senn about paying differentry forsocial media apps is for mobile data foe wich NN doesnt apply
Good, because nobody uses mobile data for internet access.
Yet
I keep seeing people arguing in favour of NN because "there's only one ISP in my area and-" but noone seems to have asked why there's only one ISP in their area. I might do some digging myself, but off the cuff it really wouldn't surprise me if a government organisation were at least partially responsible for that, be it at state, local, or federal level. For all the internet problems we have in my country, a lack of choice between ISPs is rarely one of them