Message from @franti
Discord ID: 448932951875649537
2nd most popular
I agree with it
<:pepe_smug:378719408341909506>
I won't say that the market should be completely free, because some companies can and will take advantage of that
I do not claim that the market will solve everything.
This is an important part of it
I prefer free markets to state authority
At the same time you have to make sure the system can't be exploited through government corruption (which will happen if you give the government power over the private market)
@Baraban
Yeah
Here is more
You have heard your friend or acquaintance comment on the situation of the homeless with the words: "Its his own fault. He shouldnt have started drinking. "This consideration neglects the fact that when someone is beautiful, healthy, strong and intelligent, he will hardly fall into poverty. Nobody is a volunteraly poor alcoholic without a roof over his head.
It can happen to everyone. We can have accidents, we can have strokes, we can go bankrupt and psychologically hurt, we cant get out of liquor ... We can get rid of it and maybe not. Maybe good people can help us and maybe they all turn away from us. But the certainty that no man is starving is the privilege of a civilized society.
It seems that the basic certainty of the individual is important only to him. But we create a civilized society and do not let them die of hunger or lack of health care for anyone, neither old nor sick or even lazy. The reward for civilization is the fact that we do not live in times of turmoil caused by masses in need. It appears that solidarity is a guarantee of stability in society. We understand that stability is something.
Just repeating. The fact that an individual will be solidary with the individual in times of its misery is one of the most important factors in seeking personal happiness of man, but also the stability of a civilized society. On the other hand, however, this security must not restrict the individual's efforts.
It's the same party?
This seems a bit more lefty
yes
The same party
Agreed
Well here it kina seems they use a lot of words without really saying much
Yeah
They don't come up with a solution
They have concrete policy
I am talking specifically about what you just sent
I agree with that too @franti
But it's tricky to do it in a way that doesn't restrict his efforts
I think that's the gist of the problem with welfare in general
Wich is why the party is called freedom and solidarity
The first part is the freedom the second text is the solidarity
Do they delve into the specifics?
Yes
But its long and I am lazy to translate it
Do it
Lol
Please
@franti he uses protectionism like it's an insult. The opposite of protectionism is globalism. I doubt he's a rabid globalist but extreme globalism has fucked most people. Another thing is his worry about state interference. He isn't being specific enough for me to make assumptions about his detailed position, but consumer protection is necessary, rules and guidelines are necessary, but other than that I totally agree that companies know best and a government shouldn't make executive decisions and try and keep things easy such as keep housing prices down for the benefit of both regular people and businesses trying to open stores. My personal opinion is that the government should cease control of natural monopolies, but that's a very radical position and one I'm probably alone with so I'm not going to factor it in. Depending on the answer to my worries, the party ranges from great to necessary evil in my eyes. They definitely don't seem like a bad choice.
The second set of paragraphs is quite nice 🤔
It is the compromise
so Trump amirite
Because If we let people strve it will lead to uprising
We should just do another mass cleansing
'Another' 🤔
fuck off retard