Message from @franti

Discord ID: 448932951875649537


2018-05-23 19:27:00 UTC  

2nd most popular

2018-05-23 19:27:03 UTC  

I agree with it

2018-05-23 19:27:22 UTC  

<:pepe_smug:378719408341909506>

2018-05-23 19:28:04 UTC  

I won't say that the market should be completely free, because some companies can and will take advantage of that

2018-05-23 19:28:18 UTC  

I do not claim that the market will solve everything.

2018-05-23 19:28:28 UTC  

This is an important part of it

2018-05-23 19:29:18 UTC  

I prefer free markets to state authority

2018-05-23 19:30:48 UTC  

At the same time you have to make sure the system can't be exploited through government corruption (which will happen if you give the government power over the private market)

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/372513679964635138/448930820221304844/unknown.png

2018-05-23 19:31:09 UTC  
2018-05-23 19:33:24 UTC  

Here is more
You have heard your friend or acquaintance comment on the situation of the homeless with the words: "Its his own fault. He shouldnt have started drinking. "This consideration neglects the fact that when someone is beautiful, healthy, strong and intelligent, he will hardly fall into poverty. Nobody is a volunteraly poor alcoholic without a roof over his head.

It can happen to everyone. We can have accidents, we can have strokes, we can go bankrupt and psychologically hurt, we cant get out of liquor ... We can get rid of it and maybe not. Maybe good people can help us and maybe they all turn away from us. But the certainty that no man is starving is the privilege of a civilized society.

It seems that the basic certainty of the individual is important only to him. But we create a civilized society and do not let them die of hunger or lack of health care for anyone, neither old nor sick or even lazy. The reward for civilization is the fact that we do not live in times of turmoil caused by masses in need. It appears that solidarity is a guarantee of stability in society. We understand that stability is something.

Just repeating. The fact that an individual will be solidary with the individual in times of its misery is one of the most important factors in seeking personal happiness of man, but also the stability of a civilized society. On the other hand, however, this security must not restrict the individual's efforts.

2018-05-23 19:37:09 UTC  

It's the same party?

2018-05-23 19:37:20 UTC  

This seems a bit more lefty

2018-05-23 19:37:37 UTC  

yes

2018-05-23 19:37:47 UTC  

The same party

2018-05-23 19:37:51 UTC  

Agreed

2018-05-23 19:38:30 UTC  

Well here it kina seems they use a lot of words without really saying much

2018-05-23 19:38:37 UTC  

Yeah

2018-05-23 19:38:42 UTC  

They don't come up with a solution

2018-05-23 19:38:56 UTC  

They have concrete policy

2018-05-23 19:39:16 UTC  

It is in Slovak and I am lazy to translate it

2018-05-23 19:39:25 UTC  

I am talking specifically about what you just sent

2018-05-23 19:40:16 UTC  

I agree with that too @franti

2018-05-23 19:40:26 UTC  

But it's tricky to do it in a way that doesn't restrict his efforts

2018-05-23 19:40:37 UTC  

I think that's the gist of the problem with welfare in general

2018-05-23 19:40:59 UTC  

Wich is why the party is called freedom and solidarity

2018-05-23 19:41:19 UTC  

The first part is the freedom the second text is the solidarity

2018-05-23 19:43:01 UTC  

Do they delve into the specifics?

2018-05-23 19:43:06 UTC  

Yes

2018-05-23 19:43:18 UTC  

But its long and I am lazy to translate it

2018-05-23 19:46:27 UTC  

Do it

2018-05-23 19:47:24 UTC  

Lol

2018-05-23 19:47:33 UTC  

Please

2018-05-23 21:20:58 UTC  

@franti he uses protectionism like it's an insult. The opposite of protectionism is globalism. I doubt he's a rabid globalist but extreme globalism has fucked most people. Another thing is his worry about state interference. He isn't being specific enough for me to make assumptions about his detailed position, but consumer protection is necessary, rules and guidelines are necessary, but other than that I totally agree that companies know best and a government shouldn't make executive decisions and try and keep things easy such as keep housing prices down for the benefit of both regular people and businesses trying to open stores. My personal opinion is that the government should cease control of natural monopolies, but that's a very radical position and one I'm probably alone with so I'm not going to factor it in. Depending on the answer to my worries, the party ranges from great to necessary evil in my eyes. They definitely don't seem like a bad choice.

2018-05-23 21:21:59 UTC  

The second set of paragraphs is quite nice 🤔

2018-05-23 21:22:17 UTC  

It is the compromise

2018-05-23 21:22:23 UTC  

so Trump amirite

2018-05-23 21:22:37 UTC  

Because If we let people strve it will lead to uprising

2018-05-23 21:24:19 UTC  

We should just do another mass cleansing

2018-05-23 21:24:31 UTC  

'Another' 🤔

2018-05-23 21:24:36 UTC  

fuck off retard