Message from @DanielKO

Discord ID: 463559029202092062


2018-07-03 04:12:25 UTC  

Or Historical and priceless Art that also depicts children or Child like beings? Does that have to be destroyed too?

2018-07-03 04:12:41 UTC  

IF YOU GET AN ERECTION IT'S ILLEGAL!

2018-07-03 04:12:58 UTC  

Because the drawing didn't give you consent for the boner.

2018-07-03 04:13:26 UTC  

And just because it was perfectly fine for thousands of years in some cases doesn't make it okay in current year.

2018-07-03 04:15:06 UTC  

This is why arguments from morality don't hold water in most contexts especially without any logical reasoning behind it

2018-07-03 04:15:24 UTC  

Essentially it boils down to "I feel it's bad therefore it shouldn't be allowed"

2018-07-03 04:15:36 UTC  

You can dislike it all you want.

2018-07-03 04:15:57 UTC  

I dislike scat. I don't anyone being the bodily waste police though.

2018-07-03 04:16:44 UTC  

Hell

2018-07-03 04:16:48 UTC  

Ah but you see that actually is illegal to produce

2018-07-03 04:16:51 UTC  

I've been defending lolis this whole time

2018-07-03 04:16:56 UTC  

I dislike them. Strongly

2018-07-03 04:17:17 UTC  

In most European Countries and The United States making scat porn is illegal

2018-07-03 04:17:27 UTC  

So not really a similar argument

2018-07-03 04:17:39 UTC  

How about drawings of scat.

2018-07-03 04:17:40 UTC  

And that type of shit actually happens

2018-07-03 04:17:45 UTC  

How about watersports?

2018-07-03 04:17:54 UTC  

In most states no

2018-07-03 04:17:59 UTC  

Not sure about Europe

2018-07-03 04:18:04 UTC  

It's funny that it's technically illegal in the US yet that stops...literally no one

2018-07-03 04:18:05 UTC  

How about whatever-vomit-porn-is-called?

2018-07-03 04:18:27 UTC  

Again, live humans vs drawings

2018-07-03 04:18:53 UTC  

It's perfectly fine to draw someone getting killed but it's not ok to kill someone

2018-07-03 04:19:01 UTC  

Fantasy vs Reality

2018-07-03 04:19:06 UTC  

Real fucking simple

2018-07-03 04:20:17 UTC  

I think we're in violent agreement on this

2018-07-03 04:20:26 UTC  

What's even more hilarious is that he made the statement that porn is an indulgence, while wasting time posting on discord

2018-07-03 04:20:32 UTC  

Yeah, but the point I'm making is, what defines the line, once we hypothetically agree to ban imaginary degeneracy.

2018-07-03 04:20:32 UTC  

The hypocrisy is alarming

2018-07-03 04:21:01 UTC  

@DanielKO When it is targeted towards a specific person without their consent

2018-07-03 04:21:13 UTC  

That's essentially how the division works

2018-07-03 04:21:37 UTC  

How can you tell if a drawing gave consent?

2018-07-03 04:21:40 UTC  

Not my area of expertise but if it's like most forms of law it's one hell of a grey area at times

2018-07-03 04:21:50 UTC  

@DanielKO drawing a living person

2018-07-03 04:21:57 UTC  

That goes into defamation

2018-07-03 04:22:06 UTC  

Which you can make a case around

2018-07-03 04:22:21 UTC  

If the person doesn't exist you legally can't do shit

2018-07-03 04:22:27 UTC  

Well, if I draw a completely fictitious character, being raped by another completely fictitious character.

2018-07-03 04:22:47 UTC  

Then you did nothing wrong in the eyes of the law

2018-07-03 04:22:56 UTC  

Yes, that's my point. Once you're in fantasy land, fantasy land doesn't work like the real world.

2018-07-03 04:23:08 UTC  

I never said anything to the contrary