Message from @A Random Crusader
Discord ID: 463559004728197120
And then, why stop there? What if a woman is having sexual contact without consent, in a drawing? Which busy body will determine if consent was given, or if it's rape?
What about classic art that depicts rape?
Or Historical and priceless Art that also depicts children or Child like beings? Does that have to be destroyed too?
IF YOU GET AN ERECTION IT'S ILLEGAL!
Because the drawing didn't give you consent for the boner.
And just because it was perfectly fine for thousands of years in some cases doesn't make it okay in current year.
This is why arguments from morality don't hold water in most contexts especially without any logical reasoning behind it
Essentially it boils down to "I feel it's bad therefore it shouldn't be allowed"
You can dislike it all you want.
I dislike scat. I don't anyone being the bodily waste police though.
Hell
Ah but you see that actually is illegal to produce
I've been defending lolis this whole time
I dislike them. Strongly
In most European Countries and The United States making scat porn is illegal
So not really a similar argument
How about drawings of scat.
And that type of shit actually happens
How about watersports?
In most states no
It's funny that it's technically illegal in the US yet that stops...literally no one
How about whatever-vomit-porn-is-called?
Again, live humans vs drawings
It's perfectly fine to draw someone getting killed but it's not ok to kill someone
Fantasy vs Reality
Real fucking simple
I think we're in violent agreement on this
What's even more hilarious is that he made the statement that porn is an indulgence, while wasting time posting on discord
Yeah, but the point I'm making is, what defines the line, once we hypothetically agree to ban imaginary degeneracy.
The hypocrisy is alarming
@DanielKO When it is targeted towards a specific person without their consent
That's essentially how the division works
How can you tell if a drawing gave consent?
Not my area of expertise but if it's like most forms of law it's one hell of a grey area at times
@DanielKO drawing a living person
That goes into defamation
Which you can make a case around
If the person doesn't exist you legally can't do shit
Well, if I draw a completely fictitious character, being raped by another completely fictitious character.
Then you did nothing wrong in the eyes of the law