However, legally speaking it violates no laws

But to try and say fantasy, loli and child robots are the cornerstone to the "Degeneration of Society" while ignoring Feminism, Intersectionality, The Great Arab Migration, and many many other far more pressing issues....Is laughable. But also when your arguement is based around "Traditions" that last existed in America before Sufferage and During Jim Crow Law days, makes one question the 'Moral' arguement as well.

Anywho, I'm off. Hobo, hold the fort now.

Aight

Let the spergery continue

Suppose we do agree that loli should be outlawed. The next step is, who decides whether a drawing is illegal? Will a government agency verify each drawing to make sure it's legal? How does one confirm the age of a drawing?

And then, why stop there? What if a woman is having sexual contact without consent, in a drawing? Which busy body will determine if consent was given, or if it's rape?

What about classic art that depicts rape?

Or Historical and priceless Art that also depicts children or Child like beings? Does that have to be destroyed too?

IF YOU GET AN ERECTION IT'S ILLEGAL!

Because the drawing didn't give you consent for the boner.

And just because it was perfectly fine for thousands of years in some cases doesn't make it okay in current year.

This is why arguments from morality don't hold water in most contexts especially without any logical reasoning behind it

Essentially it boils down to "I feel it's bad therefore it shouldn't be allowed"

You can dislike it all you want.

I dislike scat. I don't anyone being the bodily waste police though.

Hell

Ah but you see that actually is illegal to produce

I've been defending lolis this whole time

I dislike them. Strongly

In most European Countries and The United States making scat porn is illegal

So not really a similar argument

How about drawings of scat.

And that type of shit actually happens

How about watersports?

In most states no

Not sure about Europe

It's funny that it's technically illegal in the US yet that stops...literally no one

How about whatever-vomit-porn-is-called?

Again, live humans vs drawings

It's perfectly fine to draw someone getting killed but it's not ok to kill someone

Fantasy vs Reality

Real fucking simple

I think we're in violent agreement on this

What's even more hilarious is that he made the statement that porn is an indulgence, while wasting time posting on discord

Yeah, but the point I'm making is, what defines the line, once we hypothetically agree to ban imaginary degeneracy.

The hypocrisy is alarming

@DanielKO When it is targeted towards a specific person without their consent

That's essentially how the division works

How can you tell if a drawing gave consent?

Not my area of expertise but if it's like most forms of law it's one hell of a grey area at times