Message from @MountainMan
Discord ID: 475092046554857502
People would have to deal with multiple law codes for different circumstances
I can understand that, as well as border patrol
How would they be funded?
It's like asking "Why should a culture have a monopoly on language?"
What's to fund? It's a document. Who funds the constitution?
No i meant border patrol, also would the law makers not want salaries?
There's never a need to create new laws. It's just a bureaucratic cesspit of self-interest. Also, local ordinances are still a thing.
Border patrol is a completely voluntary force. The monopoly on force at the border is held in-common.
Ok agreed
good talk
👌🏻
Border Patrol and the Military is Voluntary, but a salary is needed to keep them, and keep loyalty and prevent fraud.
As well, the 'Government protects property rights'. That incudes cops. Because you can defend your own, but what about when you are at work? Cops are there to aid with burglaries as well. And yes, Cops would want a salary as well.
The NAP is a fallacy, that is devoid of human nature. Just as Communism is.
Oh, this applies to federal governments only. You can keep your local cops, guaranteed.
And the NAP isn't a 'law' or any sort of 'legalism', it's a political philosophy that you apply to things.
It's step 1 in forming any policy:
"If I do X, am I aggressing against someone else? If so, how can I adjust my actions to prevent that?"
The NAP is a logical extension of Liberalism and Natural Rights.
My dick Will extend inyo ass
Good luck jamming it in there first
nice
<:cleanyourroom:429612328192049152>
Jordan joining too?
Only issue is NAP ignores human nature. In the ANcapian form without a government/cops/ect. Human nature says, "Will it harm someone, probably. Do I want/need that item for survival. Yes. Fuck it."
Or just to 'have' more
No one disagrees with you
It's not supposed to mimic human nature. Why would it? It's a *principle*.
Anti-racism ignores human nature. Should we dispose of that?
I'm anti-identitarian.
And I'm pretty sure most are here as well.
i like making distinctions
lumping are cancerous
pun intended
Yea but as you can see in reality. *pRinciples* arnt universal.
@Goblin_Slayer_Floki You're right, principles are not universal.
The other groups who have different principles are the actual enemy. Keep 'em out, or go to war with them, makes no difference to me.
self driving cars are BS https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rlbHeg7U6Tc
Yeah, these things are going to be exciting to be driving next to.
it might not even happen in the next 30 years
we might get everything automated except cars
haha
I wouldn't mind semi-trucks being automated. The interstate, long haul ones at least. They go from distribution facility to distribution facility, and they usually drive unnecessarily reckless for a huge truck, blocking lanes of traffic