And how many were actually nazis? Not counting reactionary types

Yep. Because ive been to jail already and dont want to go back. I'm not gping to go so far as to make my family outcasts WITH me because some edgelords sperging out want swastikas

YOU ARENT A GERMAN WORKER IN 1930s Deutschland

You won't go to jail for a swastika. Besides, the only major difference would be the swastika.

Its almpst larping the way people cant move on amd pave their own way and become who THEY are

No, but the swastika is the universal symbol of Fascism. If you're a nazi, own it.

I did go to jail for a swastika

Really? You sure iy wasnt something else?

Have you?

As that is not illegal.

Tell that to ashland PD

You sure you didn't get in a fight or something?

ASK ANYONE HERE

So run through with me how it happened

Even buzzfeed covered jimmy and I

What was the official charge filed?

There are articles all over. Read Those. They admit why they jailed me and it came down to sensitivity

Disturbing the peace? Inciting violence? What was the charge?

The original charges numbered 6. Criminal mischief III

THEY SPECULATED could be incitement, or tgreatebing language

But did you get sentenced?

Doing jail time?

Jews almost got involved in a hate crime

So what did you actually do though? Did you threaten anyone (or what couldve been misconstrued as such)

Did you just walk around with a swastika flag? Or is this regarding the truck?

Because surely there would be another variable

Why are you so interested in getting information from us about our history? You asked me similar questions.

Do you want my address?

I think @khimære just wants to understand how the swastika, while not illegal, could lead to someone's arrest. The answer is quite simple. They were posted on someone else's private property.

Jimmy that's not quite the whole story.

But I think @Australopithecus Jordan has a good point.

No, it's not the whole story, but I didn't want to tell the part about you self-reporting your crime.

lol

Jimmy is right. It might not be the whole story, but it's the part that counts. You weren't arrested over a swastika; they may not have liked your swastikas, but the charges they were able to file on you stemmed from the manner in which you distributed your opinions. You should be intellectually honest about that.

I'm of the opinion that the biggest failing on our part is the rejection of valuable operatives over their choice of tactics and strategies. Choosing to wear a mask does not necessarily undermine the opportunities of those choosing not to wear masks, nor vice versa. Choosing to implement SIEGE does not necessarily undermine the efforts of those choosing to implement Rules for Radicals, nor vice versa. We aren't losing because persons favoring one strategy or the other are "wrong," as the core disagreement there is really about effectiveness. We lose because we elevate the effectiveness argument to such a lofty place of importance that it becomes personalized, and we then feel compelled to reject a person simply because they disagree with me over wearing a tie/boots/mask...

^^^. Incidentally, I wore a tie on the day of the "JEWS DID 911" demonstration and I don't think it hurt me in the eyes of the cop who responded.

The flyers drew attention only because of the swastikas

Medford got the same treatment and didnt give 1 fuck

And they were only able to criminalize those swastikas due to the method by which you procured them.

Yes, the swastika flyers drew attention, but @khimære already knows that swastikas draw attention. He wants to know how that attention gets translated into an arrest.

By people complaining and filing charges