Message from @Capitán Alatriste

Discord ID: 476929193095987200


2018-08-09 01:42:54 UTC  

Depending on which actual fasist we are talking about

2018-08-09 01:43:01 UTC  

The overwehlming number fall to the left. Especially if they followed what musilini created as facist.

2018-08-09 01:43:22 UTC  

@DanConway socialism, as marx said is the stepping stone to communism by which the state has complete ownership of industry and the means of production. Private property does not exist and the economy is centrally planned to the needs of the workers.

2018-08-09 01:43:23 UTC  

Only a small handful fall right. Most of those were like imperial japan

2018-08-09 01:43:27 UTC  

South american "facism" was a lot more cneter

2018-08-09 01:43:48 UTC  

Cause marx is a great intelectual that you take seriously

2018-08-09 01:43:57 UTC  

Yes i understand that @Capitán Alatriste

2018-08-09 01:44:02 UTC  

Well he coined the term

2018-08-09 01:44:15 UTC  

So may as well use his definition

2018-08-09 01:44:16 UTC  

Facism was created later

2018-08-09 01:44:31 UTC  

So you mean if they are not using the policies as a stepping stone they are not socialist?

2018-08-09 01:44:32 UTC  

taking from totalitarian regimes and socialism by musillini

2018-08-09 01:44:39 UTC  

@DanConway that's my threshold

2018-08-09 01:44:56 UTC  

Well it would be a bad way to define it

2018-08-09 01:45:09 UTC  

And all saw at its creation that facism was a middle ground between communism and Democratic capitalism

2018-08-09 01:45:14 UTC  

So democratic socialists are not real socialist?

2018-08-09 01:45:32 UTC  

If they dont see communism as the end goal?

2018-08-09 01:45:47 UTC  

Democratic socialists are those that transition to socialism by means of a democratic vote

2018-08-09 01:45:58 UTC  

If not because

2018-08-09 01:46:04 UTC  

I am on mobile sorry

2018-08-09 01:46:20 UTC  

Same, I cant avoid the typos, sorry

2018-08-09 01:46:30 UTC  

Socialism isnt just a *step stone to communism*

2018-08-09 01:46:38 UTC  

Exactly

2018-08-09 01:46:40 UTC  

Seeing as true marxist communism is a pipe dream

2018-08-09 01:46:54 UTC  

Stateless moneless society

2018-08-09 01:46:57 UTC  

And classless

2018-08-09 01:47:11 UTC  

I do not see how wothout the state

2018-08-09 01:47:14 UTC  

Communism would be the next step by which the state transfers the power to the people. A step we have not yet seen

2018-08-09 01:47:29 UTC  

Destined to either be ruled from within [tyrant] or outside [conquest]

2018-08-09 01:47:33 UTC  

Anarchy does not seem to be possible

2018-08-09 01:47:37 UTC  

I forgot the abolition of classes of course. Vital

2018-08-09 01:47:53 UTC  

It ignored human nature

2018-08-09 01:47:57 UTC  

so qill never be seen

2018-08-09 01:48:30 UTC  

How can you measure the proper allocation of resources without money @Capitán Alatriste ?

2018-08-09 01:48:55 UTC  

Humans always want more, and want their own. That form of communism can never be, because it ignores this basic human condition. And someone will simply take it over.

2018-08-09 01:49:08 UTC  

How do you know how many airports to build and train tracks to lay?

2018-08-09 01:49:10 UTC  

Even Stalin recognized that

2018-08-09 01:49:33 UTC  

As production stagnated. When he awarded people he saw a boost to their production.

2018-08-09 01:49:40 UTC  

Linen also forsaw this

2018-08-09 01:50:22 UTC  

Linen <:Commie_ball:466404411535785995>

2018-08-09 01:50:25 UTC  

@DanConway ideally yes. If you define the resources by needs, not wants ie clothing, food, shelter, medicine etc... of course a modern economy is incapable of supporting this without a universal method of payment