idk, I used to be pro abortion, but then when I saw the statistics of how many are from young women just being lazy whores I changed my mind

Here's a prompt that I found
```I have a somewhat odd stance on abortion, at least compared to the mainstream beliefs on it. Firstly, abortion is indeed killing in my opinion, especially in later stages of development. However killing isn't inherently wrong, at least legally; prisoners get the death sentence, animals are put to sleep, and cops may have to use lethal force if the situation is serious enough. It's not a "right" for a woman to have an abortion but if she wishes to kill her offspring, she can do so at her own expense, not the taxpayers'. Abortions tend to be concentrated in poorer populations as well, so I would be in favor of a voluntary sterilization program with some kind of incentive to prevent future unwanted pregnancies. I'm no activist for abortion at all but if it prevents further strain on resources via welfare and prevents possible future crime from children born in bad environments, it might be a necessary evil.
```

@Fitzydog @franti thoughts?

could work

I think that's an interesting solution

That's why I posted it here

Nah, that's degenerate ideology

Utilitarianism

did former co-worker that did brag that she had have 7 abortions. and was wondering why her kids was bullied at school. shit like that is why people are going wtf and let make it more strict

yeah I didn't really have an opinion before but now I'm only in favour in cases of ACTUALLY PROVABLE sexual assault (not "hurp I regret being a thot") or if the mother's life is in real danger if the pregnancy goes to term

^

Won't work

The kid is the paycheck if born

but the timing is wrong

couple more years of being a thot

THEN

be a single Momthot

squeeze out a kid every 5ish years

never work a day in your life

<:gay:382982146249326612>

Yeah, but the destruction of the welfare state is part of this whole thing as well lol

I'd re-write it but I cannot destroy it

It's not used for what it was designed for

Every step towards removing the burden of responsibility away from citizens, is a step towards the removal of liberty

Welfare is supposed to be

"supposed to be"

It has never been, and never will be what people *want* it to be

I am a Fisherman. My job is dangerous but I provide food for the community

IF I am washed overboard and drown, my wife and 2 children will get support. Maybe forever or until she 're-marries'

IT could also be, I am a Soldier

In some cases children keep getting it until 18

Sounds like the State is trying to hold a monopoly over insurance companies and the church

I am a Farmer

But thats your a lot od things

It's not some THOT got herself preggo

You are a soverign citizen whose responsibility is to ensure your family is taken care of in the event of your death.

That's not the states job.

It's not MY job either via taxation

Wait where does the state take care of survivers?

In most cases the state takes a huge chunk of what you leave your survivors. Via estate taxes and the like

@Fitzydog insurance is like reverse gambling

Know what's not taxes as much?

Life insurance, and the charity your local community institutions provide

Life insurance is taxed lol

*as much*