and all congenital disease is eradicated

then we'll just be sad

we need some kind of cheap chemical contraception that doesn't have any long term effects once you stop

like the current stuff seems to do

I'm talking about my country specifically, where 95% of abortions are out of convenience, and 75% of black children are aborted

Those are some fucked up numbers

That means 75% less deliquents

Unironically, our Democrats actually believe that.

They're legit racists and don't even know it

Easy access to abortion = "Oh, I don't have to worry about birth control of responsibility, because if I get pregnant the state will pay for my abortion"

No/criminalized abortion = "Maybe I should use protection to avoid the hassle or repurcussions of my behavior"


Honestly, it should be negligent homicide.

@Fitzydog You are aware catholics want also to ban contraception and many scools teach only abstinence only education

Yes, I don't agree with that.

Also, we don't have a lot of Catholics

that's a retarded way to go about sex ed

I just want a low enough "point of no return" for abortions that a majority of people are satisfied with the compromise.

We have a lot of opinions in the US ranging from absolutely no abortion or birth control all the way to 9 months late term abortions and legalized infanticide (no joke)

https://twitter.com/sean_spicier/status/1057665412664569861

@Fitzydog we have more than enough white niggers and spics

<:oof:494878589406150657>

idk, I used to be pro abortion, but then when I saw the statistics of how many are from young women just being lazy whores I changed my mind

Here's a prompt that I found
```I have a somewhat odd stance on abortion, at least compared to the mainstream beliefs on it. Firstly, abortion is indeed killing in my opinion, especially in later stages of development. However killing isn't inherently wrong, at least legally; prisoners get the death sentence, animals are put to sleep, and cops may have to use lethal force if the situation is serious enough. It's not a "right" for a woman to have an abortion but if she wishes to kill her offspring, she can do so at her own expense, not the taxpayers'. Abortions tend to be concentrated in poorer populations as well, so I would be in favor of a voluntary sterilization program with some kind of incentive to prevent future unwanted pregnancies. I'm no activist for abortion at all but if it prevents further strain on resources via welfare and prevents possible future crime from children born in bad environments, it might be a necessary evil.
```

@Fitzydog @franti thoughts?

could work

I think that's an interesting solution

That's why I posted it here

Nah, that's degenerate ideology

Utilitarianism

did former co-worker that did brag that she had have 7 abortions. and was wondering why her kids was bullied at school. shit like that is why people are going wtf and let make it more strict

yeah I didn't really have an opinion before but now I'm only in favour in cases of ACTUALLY PROVABLE sexual assault (not "hurp I regret being a thot") or if the mother's life is in real danger if the pregnancy goes to term

^

Won't work

The kid is the paycheck if born

but the timing is wrong

couple more years of being a thot

THEN

be a single Momthot

squeeze out a kid every 5ish years

never work a day in your life

<:gay:382982146249326612>

Yeah, but the destruction of the welfare state is part of this whole thing as well lol

I'd re-write it but I cannot destroy it

It's not used for what it was designed for

Every step towards removing the burden of responsibility away from citizens, is a step towards the removal of liberty