@Deleted User That is actually a very interesting question and had me thinking for a while. So my response is the following.
I would say that as a society, Communism has more merit *ideally*, and that term is important. In an ideal communist society, everyone is equal, you all enjoy pretty much full rights. Your voice is heard and has weight in the decisions of the workplace, city, region and country. You are free, and have no oppressor, or any one exploiting you. There is no social mobility because there is only one class, the proletariat. Of course, this is all ideally, and as well all know, unattainable,, and has never been able to be fully implemented properly. I'll get to this later.
Under Feudalism it is quite the opposite. The individual is theoretically "free", they are freemen. However a peasant was still bound to the land it was born in, and had to swear loyalty to its lord. It couldn't move out or leave the land unless he was granted this permission, or that person was without a lord, which was very uncommon. Social mobility was basically null, and you would die in the same position you were born as. The elites, Royalty, Nobility and Clergy would have absolute say in state and regional matters, with no representation of the peasantry. However, when comparing this to that of ideal communism, this system is in fact attainable, and has existed and worked in the past for centuries, pretty much around the world.
