Message from @Goblin_Slayer_Floki
Discord ID: 536998864226484239
@Nordhand Hmm, I've been looking at the article and looking into Fair Trade again, and I see the problem. I agree and understand with what Sylla says about the organisation. However, personally I would rather say that the objectives ought to be not to end poverty, but to lift the people they are trying to help *out* of poverty, and to more importantly pay them what they deserve
Ending poverty is the ambitious goal of many philanthropists and altruists, however it's an impossible task simply because poverty can never be eradicated
Thing is, *they know that.*
they don't want to end it. if they did end it. they loose there jobs that pays them millions
Tim explains a lot about the scam that is charity in this video from his own experience in the charity industry https://youtu.be/flodqE3sJew
The thing about poverty, is that it never ends.
So now they can forever be seen as the virtuous philanthropists helping the little people
and speak out about climate change as they fly around in their private jets
We stole their Tea and Curry
Poverty is just an ambiguous term. Because regardless how much money there is each person has the "threshold" of what is poor would just shift.
kek
I always watch it after so I can fastforward <:mad_lad:464461880786944000>
Theresa needs to get some balls <:mad_lad:464461880786944000>
Here come the traitors' move... cunts...
https://twitter.com/BethRigby/status/1087435251486519300
Except the EU wont allow it. It basically means britian leaves, rejoins, with plans to leave.
yeah, we'll end up relying on the stubborness of Juncker to get Brexit, wew
But if they manage to get this through, they will be able to get extension to Article 50 in order to have another referendum, and EU already said they will extend for that reason.
credible theory...
https://twitter.com/BethRigby/status/1087096485810978818
haha
Tom Fitton is a true American! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lPqe7GuVp-Q
how would she know? i doubt she's ever been near a dick
it a good sign they are all getting angry about it as it shows they are left out of the party this time
Deport them from Ghostbusters <:covfefe:440543908846632980>
She's just pissy because she most likely thought she was gonna get a bunch of cushy sequels from the reboot.
Oh yeah cus we just watch any old shite, just put some well known name on it
<:triggered:382980748115968000>
That's what they thought, yes.
And it worked to some extent with more niche stuff, but Ghostbusters was a bit too big, I think, and too entrenched in popular culture for them to get away with a low quality reboot relying entire on vagina power to try to pull in a new female viewership.
I will never understand the...frankly, lust, some people have with dropping their current audience in the hope of getting an entirely new set.
cus kids don't have any money, the kids have grown up now and have money
SO ruin Turtles, ruin Transformers, ruin Ghostbusters, ruin DooM