Message from @Nordhand
Discord ID: 496378508012945419
This seems painfully redundant; did she not even watch the testimony?
This woman said:
```I would have stayed on the sidelines if he had said, "I drank to excess in high school. I drank to excess in college. I did some stupid things, but I never sexually assaulted anybody"```
..that's pretty much *exactly* what he said.
she don't have to watch, she got Freedom of Speech
its a NAFTA press conference, lets talk about dem circus
Gotta get their story put together first
then all at once all media and the Democrats will release the exact same opinions
SHITHOLE <:covfefe:440543908846632980>
but Justice ππΏ
>Slovakia
>Shithole
@franti how's that mafia of a government?
@Broo TulsiGang 2024 π¬π§ πΊπΈ would could possibly go wrong
Change My Mind is a genius idea from Steven as it he says give me your best arguments as why you think Im wrong .
@Nordhand it always results in reeeing and screeching tho
and any outsider will look at it and see that one side only have reeeeee as arguments
somethingsomething firebomb
it hard that you can convince a person in an argument but if one person in the argument behave like a monkey with explosive diarrhea you have a much easier time convincing the people on the side-lines
I mean, if you look at this pragmatically, the "Change my mind" show is essentially flawed, because no matter what you say, Crowder won't change his mind, since he comes with his preconceived and established arguments and points.
The show is more that of debating people, and getting his message out to a larger audience outside of his youtube channel
He is arguing in bad faith, no? Claiming his mind can be changed, but with the actual goal of making his opponent look stupid?
I'm sure he would change his mind on an actually debatable topic with an intelligent person
Did he ever change his mind?
Has he ever spoken to someone who's not retarded? <:pepe_smug:378719408341909506>
did someone ever not reee?
The goal of the debate is like any debate. Both sides present arguements. Its really not about convincing the other side but the people on the sidelines. Few people who sit with him would be willing to change their own mind either.
yea he have not have had a peroson that ends being a turd flinging monkey in the end crying my feelings
Implying that the show isnt edited
@Deleted User he had one with that transe i think it was the only 2 genders
Implying that you aren't a gypsy
As long as you argue from first principles, it's easy to 'win' a debate
And the gun ones usually dont have ree either
The rape culture ones are full or ree tho
I like it how most times crowder has a lot more preparation anarguments prepared than most people in the street, but when someone makes an argument he has no answer for he retreats into what he criticizes other people for doing in debates
For example?
also he sits there all day and cuts it into a short video
Not really. There was once someone brought up stats and he was like, "im not sure of that. Lets look it up."
@Holy Intersectional Inquisition he cuts out the sitting but the actual times he is talking to someone its unedited, he has said that
Also, he usually has a binder of relevant evidence
Cant fault prep work.