Message from @climbhigher
Discord ID: 499708115147554816
Also tattoos are cool. Its really a societal problem with them. Personally not for me but if you put some thought into it go ahead. It can be a good look.
He's always been an absolute sperg. And sometimes it can be entertaining, but other times it can be annoying when he tries to be edgy like Gavine McInnes.
i have 3 tattoos of varying quality, all mean something but its not your business
danks tattoos are what you would expect from dank tbh
Basically shitposting in tattoo form.
well most people you see with a tattoo today did get one out of a catalogue as it the in thing to do, the ones that did get one with a meaning probably are not the people that run around and go look at my tattoo type of people
PJW keeps making these "I am smart" videos
Rather than important shit
get some views before being zucced
https://twitter.com/CountDankulaTV/status/1050109696693202950
The Paul vs Dank twitter thread
yeetyeet I’ve spent about half an hour just to memorize the replication fork
sargoy
of facade
So that's one vote to have his face on the side of a building. Got it.
**Spooks#5693** was cleansed from the server.
when in life do people have the time for healthy sleep cycles
do I have something to look forward to
I wouldn't know, my sleep cycles have been screwed up basically since I was born
FTR I turn 25 this month
@MountainMan when you retire
I think we can all agree that tattoos are a needless expense, right? Regardless of whether stupid people have more of a proclivity for them.
And yea my dad gets all the sleep he needs now that he has retired! Me on the other hand....
Tattoos are a luxury item yes
Like a tv, video game system, ect.
Needed or not is in the eye of the beholder tbh.
Jesus christ Bannon looks like he’s aged 20 years since he left DC
**CyberneticTurtle#3031** was cleansed from the server.
I’m dealing with a person who think America is actually carrying out a genocide against the Mexican people throw article 3 section d(e)
article 3 of what, exactly?
Yea of what?
Can't be the US constitution because the sections are numbered and article 3 only has 3 sections. Article 4 does have a 4th section but I don't think what little is there merits up to a subsection E
Maybe NAFTA?
Article 3 is the judicial anyways.
Yea wouldnt be nafta
Since the us isnt part of nafta
Article of the un
Sections on genocide
Basically he trying to claim the removal kids at the border is equal to genocide
Failing to figure out that his hardly destroying the border jumpers