Message from @Fitzydog
Discord ID: 507401282575925276
The only kind of trans he understands is the one with Shroedingers dick
> subjective
lol
@🌻 togepi 🌻 - No. I already said no and explained why it is no.
no you didn't
you just asserted
I am claiming they are Transcendental
and i am asking you if you understand what that means
Right, and where do they come from? What is transcendental?
<:oof:494878589406150657>
Try actually saying something
so you can go beyond whats writin in the code
to make a decision
based on your values
all transcendental concepts are just that in your head mate, unless you can prove otherwise, there is no obcetivity to that concept and is thus useless to effect this exsistance.
```Transcendental - relating to a spiritual or nonphysical realm.``` - Dictionary
Not exactly
wut
I want him to explain what he means, I want him to make a point.
why?
Transcendental is just a cop out so you don't have to proof your position.
it's crap
^^
lol
Because you're supposed to be fucking making an argument you wanker
This thing is above it because it's, `Transcendental`.
This is the state of our education system....
What is the standard of proof for objective or subjective morality?
Aight, I'm done.
the thing is that subjective morality does not necessitate a proof
the whole idea is to think for yourself
if you say something is objective then it must be true regardless of opinion, which means a proof should exist
>asks for proof
>Claims does not need proof for his position
<:thronk:441701565607444482>
subjective morality? doesn;t exsist, objective is an attempt to quantify the amount of unnecessary suffering in a given system without violating others personal rights given by society
```if you say something is objective then it must be true regardless of opinion, which means a proof should exist``` The universe exists objectively regardless of me being able to explain the proof of how it exists.
Well, from their perspective you are claiming the existance of some magical thing
my position is that there is no proof for either
@ConceptHut Not if we live in a simulation.
<:think_woke:378717098681171988>