Message from @radeon
Discord ID: 507405025203585024
You have already said it is unprovable
Because dan's a glue huffing, crayon chewing idiot
> its unprovable
> change my mind
and that is a sincere invitation
What is your standard of evidence to change your mind?
a series of well structured arguments that are logically consistent
It's from a catholic so it can't be all the sincere
> proof
Ok
Do you know AristotleΒ΄s argument for a first mover?
yes π
ok that is our starting point
lemme stop you right there
Let him finish
I started my own server, does anyone wanna join?
I have a beef with first mover
ok
If nothing can move on its own, something must move first right?
Chqnge my mind: the R9 fury is better than the GTX 1080
that is not the argument it is a question of: can there be an infinite regress?
Before the coinfags bought them all
so youre using first mover as a starting point
but you cant affirm when i restate it to you?
what is more likely in your opinion?
As infinite regress, or a first mover?
If nothing can move on its own, something must move first.
Things are moving.
Too bad gravity from one stationary object can move another stationary object.
but ill hear you out
but this is the crux
do continue im intrigued
He's talking before gravity existed, something caused it to come into existence
or, reality in general
except gravity is just the bending of spacetime.
so nothing cause it to come into existence
Gravity is a feature of reality itself, and nothing exists without reality, so we're on to first cause, which is my favorite.
Back
Let me guess
> Something can't come from nothing
> Things are here
> Something must have come first
> Whatever came first must be special so it is a god who cares about our foreskins
Well the crux of the point was that logic
a sequence of reasoning or justification that can never come to an end.
is illogical
hence an infinite regress does not fall in line with logic?
@π» togepi π» take his foreskin