no

thats what paul is doing tho
it translates to: wordplay

?

By saying there are no moral claims. You are making one moral claim

what

thus it refutes itself

Youre saying that "There are no moral claims" is a moral claim because it contains the word "moral"

But lets just define moral claim because i guess thats what were about these days

moral claim: a statement about what is right or wrong

"There are no moral claims" says nothing on the moral right or wrong of anything

By saying Nothing is right or wrong you are making a statement about what is right or wrong

no, no you are not.

It says nothing **about** right or wrong

so it is not a moral claim

no

Is saying nothing is right

3333

Is not a statement about what is right?

It is not a statement about moral right or wrong.

So it is not a moral claim

@Durtle02🤠

"Nothing is morally wrong"

hql5

I know the argument Paul is trying to make, and it's butchered

Even if it were, all weve done is prove that "There are no moral claims" is the only moral claim that can exist

-3//9 durtle

that is not a statement about right and wrong?

"There are no moral claims" does not say anything about the moral value of anything

which is like saying you have a triangle with 4 sides

wut nigga

🤦

A claim there is an absence of something is not a claim that there is a presence of it.

misanalogy 5 yards

fourangle

Is says there is no moral value in anything

which is a moral claim

No it's a claim that morality doesn't exist.

Nope youre still not get the level of detachment it has from the value of actions

It's the opposite of a moral claim its a statement that there are no moral claims

a moral claim makes a statement about the right or wrong value of actions, "There are no moral claims" does not say anything about the value of actions