Message from @π» togepi π»
Discord ID: 507409986742124545
please give me a moment to explain why
so a universe that is amoral by definition does not exist?
hey, uhh, fun fact, but 8 dimensional holographic universe theory actually has an argument for human consciousness being an emergent and necessary part of reality
<:high_iq:382980759012638731>
No i am claiming that to say that "There are no Moral claims, is of itself a moral claim"
do explain
it is illogical in the same way we would both find an infinite regress illogical
There are no Moral claims is an absolute
i wish i understood half of these words because it seems interesting
> ontological
tautological
no
thats what paul is doing tho
it translates to: wordplay
?
By saying there are no moral claims. You are making one moral claim
what
thus it refutes itself
Youre saying that "There are no moral claims" is a moral claim because it contains the word "moral"
But lets just define moral claim because i guess thats what were about these days
moral claim: a statement about what is right or wrong
By saying Nothing is right or wrong you are making a statement about what is right or wrong
no, no you are not.
It says nothing **about** right or wrong
so it is not a moral claim
no
Is saying nothing is right
3333
Is not a statement about what is right?
It is not a statement about moral right or wrong.
So it is not a moral claim
@Durtle02π€
"Nothing is morally wrong"
hql5
I know the argument Paul is trying to make, and it's butchered
Even if it were, all weve done is prove that "There are no moral claims" is the only moral claim that can exist
-3//9 durtle
that is not a statement about right and wrong?
"There are no moral claims" does not say anything about the moral value of anything
which is like saying you have a triangle with 4 sides
wut nigga