Message from @Jax the Clackker

Discord ID: 510543888679829516


2018-11-09 19:37:42 UTC  

what <:GWnanaREEEEEEEEEE:392308452208410627> <:GWsetmyxPeepoPinged:405337566787928065>

2018-11-09 19:40:22 UTC  

bad

2018-11-09 19:42:16 UTC  

<:GWslippyPeepoH:407618458872971264>

2018-11-09 19:42:44 UTC  

Maplestory?

2018-11-09 19:42:49 UTC  

homo game

2018-11-09 19:46:38 UTC  

Real men speedrun runescape

2018-11-09 19:52:59 UTC  

I would make the counter need a few distinct votes

2018-11-09 19:53:55 UTC  

Fucking perfect

2018-11-09 19:54:41 UTC  

me mother talks about the terrorist attack today

2018-11-09 19:54:51 UTC  

they didn't even call it a terrorist attack

2018-11-09 19:54:59 UTC  

and they didn't mention the car

2018-11-09 19:55:12 UTC  

cucked media much

2018-11-09 19:55:51 UTC  

@franti was there a point to that?

2018-11-09 19:57:01 UTC  

Capital punishment is so silly

2018-11-09 19:57:41 UTC  

We will tell people killing is wrong by... killing some people, at great expense to the taxpayer

2018-11-09 19:58:22 UTC  

Capital punishment is stupid, because the state has no authority to take away someone's right to life

2018-11-09 19:58:33 UTC  

Not to mention the posthumus exoneration rates of executed prisoners are way higher than exoneration for other crimes

2018-11-09 19:59:02 UTC  

@Fitzydog exactly, either you believe in murder is bad in principle or you aren't anti-murder, it's that simple

2018-11-09 19:59:08 UTC  

@Fitzydog surely that's literally the only authority the state has?

2018-11-09 19:59:57 UTC  

the state has monopoly on force, that's what makes it the state, no?

2018-11-09 20:00:03 UTC  

Negative

2018-11-09 20:00:42 UTC  

The only authority the state has, is that which you give it.

And the only legitimate authority it SHOULD have, is the arbitration of property rights disputes

2018-11-09 20:01:00 UTC  

Capital punishment can be done with greatly reduced expense. Lol

2018-11-09 20:01:07 UTC  

then no state has the right to go to war.

2018-11-09 20:01:12 UTC  

ever.

2018-11-09 20:01:19 UTC  

Probably correct, yes

2018-11-09 20:02:16 UTC  

Only need a bullet. Boom. Cost is greatly reduced.

2018-11-09 20:02:19 UTC  

how does the state have the ability to arbitrate on property disputes without monopoly on force?

2018-11-09 20:02:55 UTC  

I don't know, seems to do that just fine.

2018-11-09 20:03:36 UTC  

if the state didn't have monopoly on force, any arbitration would be mute.

2018-11-09 20:03:44 UTC  

because it would have no means to enforce it.

2018-11-09 20:03:45 UTC  

@Jax the Clackker Because we gave it that authority

2018-11-09 20:04:17 UTC  

The monopoly on force is held in commons by the citizenry

2018-11-09 20:04:32 UTC  

Thus, the 2nd amendment

2018-11-09 20:05:00 UTC  

then there's nothing wrong with vigilantism right?

2018-11-09 20:05:03 UTC  

<:GWfroggyPepoThink:400751114221256705>

2018-11-09 20:05:10 UTC  

Define vigilantism

2018-11-09 20:06:06 UTC  

civilians performing law enforcement without legal authority