Message from @Boniface
Discord ID: 655605748654407682
probably not but maybe
lol
would be interesting
that I'm unsure of, because of the probabalistic nature of it
all quantum mechanics really says is that you can never really be sure
but the transistor shows that it is useful
I mean, the human brain would likely not be a good place to host a quantum computer as we understand them currently
but if humans can use them for certain calculations maybe the brain can to a certain extent?
given enough millions of years of evolution?
well, that's my point; human thought is largely uncertain as it operates at a fundamentally probabalistic level
even simple maths can't be considered a bitwise operation in the brain as the concept of numbers is learned and is likely grounded in some form of pattern encoding in multiple neurons and axons
whereas in a binary computer, each bit resolves down to a single transistor that is either high or low
so you think quantum shennanigans in the brain are a possibility? (sorry this field is not my forte but its interesting lol)
the brain *is quantum*
I don't think it's at all discrete
unlike a normal computer
caveat: I've been thinking and reading about thought all my life, and I'm still unsure if I know anything.
now I'm :mindblown:
Yeah, one thing that sucks when trying to figure out how thought works is that I feel like human language is sorely lacking when it comes to describing the intricacies of how the mind works
talk to 100 philosophers about intelligence and you will probably have 100 definitions
it seems like its a huge problem because its almost impossible to talk about how consciousness works without talking past one another due to not having the same definitions.
supporting the hong kong rioters is supporting degeneracy
also, look at the caption under the Pelosi one
don't associate pelosi with socialism
we don't want her
When the UK controlled HK was it called Hong Bong?
probably
what's with all the gay shit?
hong kong trying to be western
because that way they will get more trade and corporations will love them
i wish people would ask that more often tbh
ask that question
@DA GOMMIE JOO That’s why I’m supporting them
so, with reguards to the definitions of objective and subjective as we were talking about in meme channel it seems like some of the people here don't like the dictionary definition of objective and think such a definition is bad because in means that almost nothing is objective thus rendering the word not very useful. I would argue in response that using the word objective for subjective things is even worse because at that point both words basically mean the same thing. Its like abusing the word literally for things that are meant figuratively. It does not enhance the word literally to use it poorly and it does not enhance the word objective to use it poorly either.
Jesus is the only God
no
The Alternative Hypothesis and Black Pigeon Speaks collaboration against Shaun