Message from @johny1846
Discord ID: 637293340571860994
They can use that to argue for those things already, as they know about the existence of deep fakes
Where the tech goes from here, publicity-wise, doesn't affect that very much
They can and will make whatever arguments they like, and if not these arguments, they will make other ones
I don't think the existence of deep fakes *meaningfully* affects their ability to create a deeper police state, is what I'm trying to say
We'll see if this won't be used past making porn video's about AOC
no such thing as state overreach
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
I don't have any numbers on it, but i'd be curious to know what are the predominant evidence methods currently used to convict criminals.
None of you believe there will be a transition period for stuff like this? People will be instantly redpilled? I dont buy it. Especially in Europe where people get convicted for tweets they cant even prove were written by them.
I bet the jews love this though, it means soon you can personify your stepmom pornhub fantasies
no people are selected by the redpill
and people like u and i will only propogate if the redpill selection machine helps with fertility and lifestyle
haha, soon™
I am Muslim ama
When will you leave our countries
does your mother make good curry?
<:basedmama:396156349676781569>
Her mother is in the curry
Hey what’s up guys
I believe global warming is a real phenomenon
Explain how historic levels of atmospheric CO2 did not contribute towards runaway warming. Then I might consider debating.
I'm specifically talking about periods in history when atmospheric CO2 was at levels ~1500ppm
@oojimaflip can you give me one instance of this? There are different reasons for different time periods.
Carboniferous period will do. As far as I can see the contention of climate scientists is that increased atmospheric CO2 will lead, via the greenhouse effect, to Earth becomming more like Venus.
if this were true, Earth would already look like Venus.
What was the carbon dioxide ppm at that time
~1500ppm
I mean Venus has an atmosphere of 96% carbon dioxide it says I’m not sure having a atmosphere of 1500 ppm would make it turn into Venus
not in terms of atmospheric compostition, no. But that's not the contention.
What
"atmospheric CO2 levels >400ppm (current) will lead to catastrophic temperature rise."
that's the contention, is it not?
So there is a difference between these things. In ones instance the temperature gain were slower. The ecosystem is able to adapt over the 100,000 or what ever time period. 10000 years maybe. Human beings are raising co2 levels a lot more a quickly and this is why it will lead to catastrophic effects
it's also a fallacy that "Venus is hot because it's atmosphere is 96% CO2"
Venus is hot because it's atmosphere is much thicker than Earth's
Well it’s actually 2 things. It’s high co2 levels and it’s thicker atmosphere. We can observe the green house effect of co2 in experiments. High schoolers do this.
So we know co2 has this effect
the rate of temp change does not explain why 1500ppm would not cause further (increasing) temp rise
where's the runaway greenhouse effect?
What do you mean? What it seems is the carbon dioxide increased more plants started to over grow took the carbon dioxide out of the air.