Message from @Banjod
Discord ID: 634715508863795200
no they dont
thats just the Y part
I think we all have blonde genes.
<:JFGOD:439598359628611604>
it might be true, but that map doesn't prove it
Markoman BTFO
chat shut down
Haplogroups indicate shared ancestry along the maternal and paternal lines lol
yes
but they don't mean much
That makes no sense
it depends on how the haplogroup got where it got
I think people probably invest too much into maps like this but nonetheless
it's because half is lost
every time
if it was just a few men dominating the whole population in the new place, you might not get that much autosomal dna
Whichever two are most common in a population can best distinguish them from others, although you still need to account for admixture along both lines
You can also infer a lot from language variation
I1 in norway
but if it was a large migration, or a long period of migration, you would
it's not even the same in terms of that
Yes that's what subclades are for
i'm telling you right now
R1b is most common in all of Europe but clearly there are distinctions
Anyway, Anglos took over the world by being chads
you need to throw haplogroups out of the window
it's good for 1 thing only
And your europoor copes are annoying
and that's to show that it's a line of descent
as in
Yes, subclades can distinguish population groups
replacement and movement
Or Norwegian I1 from 'other' I1
Yes
it still doens't work
it's still mostly useless
They don't think it work like it do, but it do
on anglo hair colour: it's not as simple as 'blond or brown'
Anglos tend to have hair which sits between the two colours
Anglos also have nifty red